REGIS - Reg. Intermediation Services 2019/1150 EN

(b)	are easily available to business_users at all stages of their commercial relationship with the provider of online_intermediation_services, including in the pre-contractual stage;

(c)	set out the grounds for decisions to suspend or terminate or impose any other kind of restriction upon, in whole or in part, the provision of their online_intermediation_services to business_users;

(d)	include information on any additional distribution channels and potential affiliate programmes through which providers of online_intermediation_services might market goods and services offered by business_users;

(e)	include general information regarding the effects of the terms_and_conditions on the ownership and control of intellectual property rights of business_users.

2. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall notify, on a durable_medium, to the business_users concerned any proposed changes of their terms_and_conditions.

The proposed changes shall not be implemented before the expiry of a notice period which is reasonable and proportionate to the nature and extent of the envisaged changes and to their consequences for the business_user concerned. That notice period shall be at least 15 days from the date on which the provider of online_intermediation_services notifies the business_users concerned about the proposed changes. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall grant longer notice periods when this is necessary to allow business_users to make technical or commercial adaptations to comply with the changes.

The business_user concerned shall have the right to terminate the contract with the provider of online_intermediation_services before the expiry of the notice period. Such termination shall take effect within 15 days from the receipt of the notice pursuant to the first subparagraph, unless a shorter period applies to the contract.

The business_user concerned may, either by means of a written statement or a clear affirmative action, waive the notice period referred to in the second subparagraph at any moment from the receipt of the notice pursuant to the first subparagraph.

During the notice period, submitting new goods or services to the online_intermediation_services shall be considered clear affirmative action to waive the notice period, except in cases where the reasonable and proportionate notice period is longer than 15 days because the changes to the terms_and_conditions require the business_user to make significant technical adjustments to its goods or services. In such cases, the notice period shall not be considered automatically to be waived where the business_user submits new goods and services.

3. Terms and conditions, or specific provisions thereof, which do not comply with the requirements of paragraph 1, as well as changes to terms_and_conditions implemented by a provider of online_intermediation_services contrary to the provisions of paragraph 2 shall be null and void.

4. The notice period set out in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 shall not apply where a provider of online_intermediation_services:

(a)	is subject to a legal or regulatory obligation which requires it to change its terms_and_conditions in a manner which does not allow it to respect the notice period referred to in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2;

(b)	has exceptionally to change its terms_and_conditions to address an unforeseen and imminent danger related to defending the online_intermediation_services, consumers or business_users from fraud, malware, spam, data breaches or other cybersecurity risks.

5. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall ensure that the identity of the business_user providing the goods or services on the online_intermediation_services is clearly visible.

Article 11

Internal complaint-handling system

1. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall provide for an internal system for handling the complaints of business_users.

That internal complaint-handling system shall be easily accessible and free of charge for business_users and shall ensure handling within a reasonable time frame. It shall be based on the principles of transparency and equal treatment applied to equivalent situations, and treating complaints in a manner which is proportionate to their importance and complexity. It shall allow business_users to lodge complaints directly with the provider concerned regarding any of the following issues:

(a)	alleged non-compliance by that provider with any obligations laid down in this Regulation which affects the business_user lodging the complaint (‘the complainant’);

(b)	technological issues which relate directly to the provision of online_intermediation_services, and which affect the complainant;

(c)	measures taken by, or behaviour of, that provider which relate directly to the provision of the online_intermediation_services, and which affect the complainant.

2. As part of their internal complaint-handling system, providers of online_intermediation_services shall:

(a)	duly consider complaints lodged and the follow-up which they may need to give to the complaint in order to adequately address the issue raised;

(b)	process complaints swiftly and effectively, taking into account the importance and complexity of the issue raised;

(c)	communicate to the complainant the outcome of the internal complaint-handling process, in an individualised manner and drafted in plain and intelligible language.

3. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall provide in their terms_and_conditions all relevant information relating to the access to and functioning of their internal complaint-handling system.

4. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall establish and make easily available to the public information on the functioning and effectiveness of their internal complaint-handling system. They shall verify the information at least annually and where significant changes are needed, they shall update that information.

That information shall include the total number of complaints lodged, the main types of complaints, the average time period needed to process the complaints and aggregated information regarding the outcome of the complaints.

5. The provisions of this Article shall not apply to providers of online_intermediation_services that are small enterprises within the meaning of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC.

Article 14

Judicial proceedings by representative organisations or associations and by public bodies

1. Organisations and associations that have a legitimate interest in representing business_users or in representing corporate_website_users, as well as public bodies set up in Member States, shall have the right to take action before competent national courts in the Union, in accordance with the rules of the law of the Member State where the action is brought, to stop or prohibit any non-compliance by providers of online_intermediation_services or by providers of online_search_engines, with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation.

2. The Commission shall encourage Member States to exchange best practices and information with other Member States, based on registries of unlawful acts which have been subject to injunction orders before national courts, where such registries are set up by relevant public bodies or authorities.

3. Organisations or associations shall have the right referred to in paragraph 1 only where they meet all of the following requirements:

(a)	they are properly established in accordance with the law of a Member State;

(b)	they pursue objectives that are in the collective interest of the group of business_users or corporate_website_users that they represent on a sustained basis;

(c)	they are of a non-profit making character;

(d)	their decision-making is not unduly influenced by any third party providers of financing, in particular by providers of online_intermediation_services or of online_search_engines.

To this end, organisations or associations shall fully and publicly disclose information on their membership and source of financing.

4. In Member States where public bodies have been set up, those public bodies shall have the right referred to in paragraph 1, where they are charged with defending the collective interests of business_users or corporate_website_users or with ensuring compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned.

5. Member States may designate:

(a)	organisations or associations established in their Member State that meet at least the requirements of paragraph 3 at the request of those organisations or associations;

(b)	public bodies set up in their Member State that meet the requirements of paragraph 4

that are granted the right referred to in paragraph 1. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the name and purpose of any such designated organisations, associations or public bodies.

6. The Commission shall draw up a list of the organisations, associations and public bodies designated in accordance with paragraph 5. That list shall specify the purpose of those organisations, associations and public bodies. That list shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Changes to the list shall be published without delay and, in any event, an updated list shall be drawn up and published every six months.

7. The court shall accept the list referred to in paragraph 6 as proof of the legal capacity of the organisation, association or public body, without prejudice to the court’s right to examine whether the purpose of the claimant justifies its taking action in a specific case.

8. If a Member State or the Commission raises concerns regarding the compliance, by an organisation or association, with the criteria laid down in paragraph 3, or, by a public body, with the criteria laid down in paragraph 4, the Member State that designated that organisation, association or public body in accordance with paragraph 5 shall investigate the concerns and, where appropriate, revoke the designation if one or more of the criteria are not complied with.

9. The right referred to in paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the rights of business_users and corporate_website_users to start any action before competent national courts, in accordance with the rules of the law of the Member State where the action is brought, which is based on individual rights and aims to stop any non-compliance, by providers of online_intermediation_services or providers of online_search_engines, with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation.

Article 18

Review

1. By 13 January 2022, and subsequently every three years, the Commission shall evaluate this Regulation and report to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee.

2. The first evaluation of this Regulation shall be carried out, in particular, with a view to the following:

(a)	assessing the compliance with, and impact on the online platform economy of, the obligations laid down in Articles 3 to 10;

(b)	assessing the impact and effectiveness of any established codes of conduct to improve fairness and transparency;

(c)	investigating further the problems caused by the dependence of business_users on online_intermediation_services, and problems caused by unfair commercial practices by providers of online_intermediation_services, and to determine further to which extent those practices continue to be widespread;

(d)

investigating whether the competition between goods or services offered by a business_user and goods or services offered or controlled by a provider of online_intermediation_services constitutes fair competition and whether providers of online_intermediation_services misuse privileged data in this regard;

(e)	assessing the effect of this Regulation on any possible imbalances in the relationships between providers of operating systems and their business_users;

(f)	assessing whether the scope of the Regulation, especially as regards the definition of ‘business user’, is suitable in that it does not encourage bogus self-employment.

The first and subsequent evaluations shall establish whether additional rules, including regarding enforcement, may be required to ensure a fair, predictable, sustainable and trusted online business environment within the internal market. Following the evaluations, the Commission shall take appropriate measures, which may include legislative proposals.

3. Member States shall provide any relevant information they have that the Commission may require for the purposes of drawing up the report referred to in paragraph 1.

4. In carrying out the evaluation of this Regulation, the Commission shall take into account inter alia, the opinions and reports presented to it by the group of experts for the Observatory on the Online Platform Economy. It shall also take into account the content and functioning of any codes of conduct referred to in Article 17, where appropriate.

whereas

(15) To ensure that the general terms_and_conditions of a contractual relationship enable business_users to determine the commercial conditions for the use, termination and suspension of online_intermediation_services, and to achieve predictability regarding their business relationship, those terms_and_conditions should be drafted in plain and intelligible language.
Terms and conditions should not be considered to have been drafted in plain and intelligible language where they are vague, unspecific or lack detail on important commercial issues and thus fail to give business_users a reasonable degree of predictability on the most important aspects of the contractual relationship.
Moreover, misleading language should not be considered to be plain and intelligible.

- = -

(16) In order to ensure that business_users have sufficient clarity regarding where, and to whom, their goods or services are being marketed, providers of online_intermediation_services should ensure, towards their business_users, the transparency of any additional distribution channels and potential affiliate programmes that they might use to market those goods or services.
Additional channels and affiliate programmes should be understood in a technologically neutral manner but could, inter alia, include other websites, apps or other online_intermediation_services used to market the goods or services offered by the business_user.

- = -

(17) The ownership and control of intellectual property rights online can have significant economic importance for both the providers of online_intermediation_services and their business_users.
To ensure clarity and transparency for business_users and for their better understanding, providers of online_intermediation_services should within their terms_and_conditions include general, or more detailed, information if they so wish, regarding the overall effects, if any, of those terms_and_conditions on the ownership and control of intellectual property rights of the business_user.
Such information could, inter alia, include information such as the general usage of logos, trademarks or brand names.

- = -

(38) The requirements of this Regulation regarding the internal complaint-handling systems aim to allow providers of online_intermediation_services a reasonable degree of flexibility when operating those systems and addressing individual complaints, so as to minimise any administrative burden.
In addition, the internal complaint-handling systems should allow providers of online_intermediation_services to address, where necessary, in a proportionate manner any use in bad faith which certain business_users might seek to make of those systems.
In light of the costs of setting up and operating such systems, it is appropriate to exempt from those obligations any providers of online_intermediation_services which constitute small enterprises, in line with the relevant provisions of Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC (9).
The consolidation rules laid down in that Recommendation ensure that any circumvention is prevented.
That exemption should not affect the right of such enterprises to set up, on a voluntary basis, an internal complaint-handling system that complies with the criteria set out in this Regulation.

- = -

(40) Mediation can offer providers of online_intermediation_services and their business_users a means to resolve disputes in a satisfactory manner, without having to use judicial proceedings which can be lengthy and costly.
Therefore, providers of online_intermediation_services should facilitate mediation by, in particular, identifying at least two public or private mediators with which they are willing to engage.
The aim of requiring the identification of a minimum number of mediators is to safeguard the mediators’ neutrality.
Mediators which provide their services from a location outside the Union should only be identified where it is guaranteed that the use of those services does not in any way deprive the business_users concerned of any legal protection offered to them under Union law or the law of the Member States, including the requirements of this Regulation and the applicable law regarding protection of personal data and trade secrets.
In order to be accessible, fair, and as swift, efficient and effective as possible, those mediators should meet certain set criteria.
Nonetheless, providers of online_intermediation_services and their business_users should remain free to jointly identify any mediator of their choice after a dispute has arisen between them.
In line with Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (10), the mediation provided for in this Regulation should be a voluntary process in the sense that the parties are themselves in charge of the process and can start and terminate it at any time.
Notwithstanding its voluntary nature, providers of online_intermediation_services should examine in good faith requests to engage in the mediation provided for in this Regulation.

- = -

(45) The identity of organisations, associations and public bodies which, in the view of the Member States, should be qualified to bring an action under this Regulation, should be communicated to the Commission.
In the course of such a communication, Member States should make specific reference to the relevant national provisions according to which the organisation, association or public body was established and, where appropriate, refer to the relevant public register in which the organisation or association is registered.
This additional option of a designation by Member States should provide for a certain level of legal certainty and predictability that business_users and corporate_website_users can rely on.
At the same time, it aims at making judicial procedures more efficient and shorter, which seems appropriate in this context.
The Commission should ensure the publication of a list of those organisations, associations and public bodies in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Inclusion on that list should serve as refutable proof of the legal capacity of the organisation, association or public body bringing the action.
Where there are any concerns regarding a designation, the Member State which designated an organisation, association or public body should investigate those concerns.
Organisations, associations and public bodies that are not designated by a Member State should have the possibility to bring an action before national courts subject to examination of legal capacity according to the criteria set out in this Regulation.

- = -

keyboard_tab REGIS - Reg. Intermediation Services 2019/1150 EN

REGIS - Reg. Intermediation Services 2019/1150 EN