REGIS - Reg. Intermediation Services 2019/1150 EN

1. Providers of online_intermediation_services shall set out in their terms_and_conditions the main parameters determining ranking and the reasons for the relative importance of those main parameters as opposed to other parameters.

2. Providers of online_search_engines shall set out the main parameters, which individually or collectively are most significant in determining ranking and the relative importance of those main parameters, by providing an easily and publicly available description, drafted in plain and intelligible language, on the online_search_engines of those providers. They shall keep that description up to date.

3. Where the main parameters include the possibility to influence ranking against any direct or indirect remuneration paid by business_users or corporate_website_users to the respective provider, that provider shall also set out a description of those possibilities and of the effects of such remuneration on ranking in accordance with the requirements set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.

4. Where a provider of an online_search_engine has altered the ranking order in a specific case or delisted a particular website following a third party notification, the provider shall offer the possibility for the corporate_website_user to inspect the contents of the notification.

5. The descriptions referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall be sufficient to enable the business_users or corporate_website_users to obtain an adequate understanding of whether, and if so how and to what extent, the ranking mechanism takes account of the following:

(a)	the characteristics of the goods and services offered to consumers through the online_intermediation_services or the online_search_engine;

(b)	the relevance of those characteristics for those consumers;

(c)	as regards online_search_engines, the design characteristics of the website used by corporate_website_users.

6. Providers of online_intermediation_services and providers of online_search_engines shall, when complying with the requirements of this Article, not be required to disclose algorithms or any information that, with reasonable certainty, would result in the enabling of deception of consumers or consumer harm through the manipulation of search results. This Article shall be without prejudice to Directive (EU) 2016/943.

7. To facilitate the compliance of providers of online_intermediation_services and providers of online_search_engines with and the enforcement of the requirements of this Article, the Commission shall accompany the transparency requirements set out in this Article with guidelines.

Article 14

Judicial proceedings by representative organisations or associations and by public bodies

1. Organisations and associations that have a legitimate interest in representing business_users or in representing corporate_website_users, as well as public bodies set up in Member States, shall have the right to take action before competent national courts in the Union, in accordance with the rules of the law of the Member State where the action is brought, to stop or prohibit any non-compliance by providers of online_intermediation_services or by providers of online_search_engines, with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation.

2. The Commission shall encourage Member States to exchange best practices and information with other Member States, based on registries of unlawful acts which have been subject to injunction orders before national courts, where such registries are set up by relevant public bodies or authorities.

3. Organisations or associations shall have the right referred to in paragraph 1 only where they meet all of the following requirements:

(a)	they are properly established in accordance with the law of a Member State;

(b)	they pursue objectives that are in the collective interest of the group of business_users or corporate_website_users that they represent on a sustained basis;

(c)	they are of a non-profit making character;

(d)	their decision-making is not unduly influenced by any third party providers of financing, in particular by providers of online_intermediation_services or of online_search_engines.

To this end, organisations or associations shall fully and publicly disclose information on their membership and source of financing.

4. In Member States where public bodies have been set up, those public bodies shall have the right referred to in paragraph 1, where they are charged with defending the collective interests of business_users or corporate_website_users or with ensuring compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, in accordance with the national law of the Member State concerned.

5. Member States may designate:

(a)	organisations or associations established in their Member State that meet at least the requirements of paragraph 3 at the request of those organisations or associations;

(b)	public bodies set up in their Member State that meet the requirements of paragraph 4

that are granted the right referred to in paragraph 1. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the name and purpose of any such designated organisations, associations or public bodies.

6. The Commission shall draw up a list of the organisations, associations and public bodies designated in accordance with paragraph 5. That list shall specify the purpose of those organisations, associations and public bodies. That list shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Changes to the list shall be published without delay and, in any event, an updated list shall be drawn up and published every six months.

7. The court shall accept the list referred to in paragraph 6 as proof of the legal capacity of the organisation, association or public body, without prejudice to the court’s right to examine whether the purpose of the claimant justifies its taking action in a specific case.

8. If a Member State or the Commission raises concerns regarding the compliance, by an organisation or association, with the criteria laid down in paragraph 3, or, by a public body, with the criteria laid down in paragraph 4, the Member State that designated that organisation, association or public body in accordance with paragraph 5 shall investigate the concerns and, where appropriate, revoke the designation if one or more of the criteria are not complied with.

9. The right referred to in paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the rights of business_users and corporate_website_users to start any action before competent national courts, in accordance with the rules of the law of the Member State where the action is brought, which is based on individual rights and aims to stop any non-compliance, by providers of online_intermediation_services or providers of online_search_engines, with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation.

whereas

(22) A provider of online_intermediation_services can have legitimate reasons to decide to restrict, suspend or terminate the provision of its services to a given business_user, including by delisting individual goods or services of a given business_user or effectively removing search results.
Short of being suspended, providers of online_intermediation_services can also restrict individual listings of business_users; for example, through their demotion or by negatively affecting a business_user’s appearance (‘dimming’) which can include lowering its ranking.
However, given that such decisions can significantly affect the interests of the business_user concerned, they should be provided, prior to or at the time of the restriction or suspension taking effect, with a statement of reasons for that decision on a durable_medium.
To minimise the negative impact of such decisions on business_users, providers of online_intermediation_services should also allow an opportunity to clarify the facts that led to that decision in the framework of the internal complaint-handling process, which will help the business_user, where this is possible, to re-establish compliance.
In addition, where the provider of online_intermediation_services revokes the decision to restrict, suspend or terminate, for example because the decision was made in error or the infringement of terms_and_conditions that led to this decision was not committed in bad faith and has been remedied in a satisfactory manner, the provider should reinstate the business_user concerned without undue delay, including providing the business_user with any access to personal or other data, or both, available prior to the decision.

- = -

(23) The termination of the whole of the online_intermediation_services and the related deletion of data provided for the use of, or generated through, the provision of online_intermediation_services represent a loss of essential information which could have a significant impact on business_users and could also impair their ability to properly exercise other rights granted to them by this Regulation.
Therefore, the provider of online_intermediation_services should provide the business_user concerned with a statement of reasons on a durable_medium, at least 30 days before the termination of the provision of the whole of its online_intermediation_services enters into effect.
However, in cases where a legal or regulatory obligation requires a provider of online_intermediation_services to terminate the provision of the whole of its online_intermediation_services to a given business_user, this notice period should not apply.
Equally, the notice period of 30 days should not apply where a provider of online_intermediation_services invokes rights of termination under national law in compliance with Union law which allow immediate termination where, taking into account all the circumstances of the specific case and weighing the interests of both parties, it cannot reasonably be expected to continue the contractual relationship until the agreed end or until the expiry of a notice period.
Finally, the notice period of 30 days should not apply where a provider of online_intermediation_services can demonstrate a repeated infringement of terms_and_conditions.
The various exceptions to the 30-day notice period can in particular arise in connection with illicit or inappropriate content, the safety of a good or service, counterfeiting, fraud, malware, spam, data breaches, other cybersecurity risks or suitability of the good or service to minors.
In order to ensure proportionality, providers of online_intermediation_services should, where reasonable and technically feasible, delist only individual goods or services of a business_user.
Termination of the whole of the online_intermediation_services constitutes the most severe measure.

- = -

(43) In order to facilitate the settlement of disputes relating to the provision of online_intermediation_services using mediation in the Union, the Commission should, in close cooperation with the Member States, encourage the setting up of specialised mediation organisations, which are currently lacking.
The involvement of mediators having specialist knowledge of online_intermediation_services as well as of the specific industry sectors within which those services are provided should add to the confidence both parties have in the mediation process and should increase the likelihood of that process leading to a swift, just and satisfactory outcome.

- = -

(45) The identity of organisations, associations and public bodies which, in the view of the Member States, should be qualified to bring an action under this Regulation, should be communicated to the Commission.
In the course of such a communication, Member States should make specific reference to the relevant national provisions according to which the organisation, association or public body was established and, where appropriate, refer to the relevant public register in which the organisation or association is registered.
This additional option of a designation by Member States should provide for a certain level of legal certainty and predictability that business_users and corporate_website_users can rely on.
At the same time, it aims at making judicial procedures more efficient and shorter, which seems appropriate in this context.
The Commission should ensure the publication of a list of those organisations, associations and public bodies in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Inclusion on that list should serve as refutable proof of the legal capacity of the organisation, association or public body bringing the action.
Where there are any concerns regarding a designation, the Member State which designated an organisation, association or public body should investigate those concerns.
Organisations, associations and public bodies that are not designated by a Member State should have the possibility to bring an action before national courts subject to examination of legal capacity according to the criteria set out in this Regulation.

- = -

keyboard_tab REGIS - Reg. Intermediation Services 2019/1150 EN

REGIS - Reg. Intermediation Services 2019/1150 EN