EIDAS 2014/0910 EN

1. This Regulation applies to electronic_identification schemes that have been notified by a Member State, and to trust_service providers that are established in the Union.

2. This Regulation does not apply to the provision of trust_services that are used exclusively within closed systems resulting from national law or from agreements between a defined set of participants.

3. This Regulation does not affect national or Union law related to the conclusion and validity of contracts or other legal or procedural obligations relating to form.

Article 13

Liability and burden of proof

1. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, trust_service providers shall be liable for damage caused intentionally or negligently to any natural or legal person due to a failure to comply with the obligations under this Regulation.

The burden of proving intention or negligence of a non-qualified trust_service provider shall lie with the natural or legal person claiming the damage referred to in the first subparagraph.

The intention or negligence of a qualified trust_service provider shall be presumed unless that qualified trust_service provider proves that the damage referred to in the first subparagraph occurred without the intention or negligence of that qualified trust_service provider.

2. Where trust_service providers duly inform their customers in advance of the limitations on the use of the services they provide and where those limitations are recognisable to third parties, trust_service providers shall not be liable for damages arising from the use of services exceeding the indicated limitations.

3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be applied in accordance with national rules on liability.

Article 14

International aspects

1. Trust services provided by trust_service providers established in a third country shall be recognised as legally equivalent to qualified trust_services provided by qualified trust_service providers established in the Union where the trust_services originating from the third country are recognised under an agreement concluded between the Union and the third country in question or an international organisation in accordance with Article 218 TFEU.

2. Agreements referred to in paragraph 1 shall ensure, in particular, that:

(a)

the requirements applicable to qualified trust_service providers established in the Union and the qualified trust_services they provide are met by the trust_service providers in the third country or international organisations with which the agreement is concluded, and by the trust_services they provide;

(b)	the qualified trust_services provided by qualified trust_service providers established in the Union are recognised as legally equivalent to trust_services provided by trust_service providers in the third country or international organisation with which the agreement is concluded.

Article 17

Supervisory body

1. Member States shall designate a supervisory body established in their territory or, upon mutual agreement with another Member State, a supervisory body established in that other Member State. That body shall be responsible for supervisory tasks in the designating Member State.

Supervisory bodies shall be given the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks.

2. Member States shall notify to the Commission the names and the addresses of their respective designated supervisory bodies.

3. The role of the supervisory body shall be the following:

(a)

to supervise qualified trust_service providers established in the territory of the designating Member State to ensure, through ex ante and ex post supervisory activities, that those qualified trust_service providers and the qualified trust_services that they provide meet the requirements laid down in this Regulation;

(b)

to take action if necessary, in relation to non-qualified trust_service providers established in the territory of the designating Member State, through ex post supervisory activities, when informed that those non-qualified trust_service providers or the trust_services they provide allegedly do not meet the requirements laid down in this Regulation.

4. For the purposes of paragraph 3 and subject to the limitations provided therein, the tasks of the supervisory body shall include in particular:

(a)	to cooperate with other supervisory bodies and provide them with assistance in accordance with Article 18;

(b)	to analyse the conformity assessment reports referred to in Articles 20(1) and 21(1);

(c)	to inform other supervisory bodies and the public about breaches of security or loss of integrity in accordance with Article 19(2);

(d)	to report to the Commission about its main activities in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article;

(e)	to carry out audits or request a conformity_assessment_body to perform a conformity assessment of the qualified trust_service providers in accordance with Article 20(2);

(f)	to cooperate with the data protection authorities, in particular, by informing them without undue delay, about the results of audits of qualified trust_service providers, where personal data protection rules appear to have been breached;

(g)	to grant qualified status to trust_service providers and to the services they provide and to withdraw this status in accordance with Articles 20 and 21;

(h)	to inform the body responsible for the national trusted list referred to in Article 22(3) about its decisions to grant or to withdraw qualified status, unless that body is also the supervisory body;

(i)	to verify the existence and correct application of provisions on termination plans in cases where the qualified trust_service provider ceases its activities, including how information is kept accessible in accordance with point (h) of Article 24(2);

(j)	to require that trust_service providers remedy any failure to fulfil the requirements laid down in this Regulation.

5. Member States may require the supervisory body to establish, maintain and update a trust infrastructure in accordance with the conditions under national law.

6. By 31 March each year, each supervisory body shall submit to the Commission a report on its previous calendar year’s main activities together with a summary of breach notifications received from trust_service providers in accordance with Article 19(2).

7. The Commission shall make the annual report referred to in paragraph 6 available to Member States.

8. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, define the formats and procedures for the report referred to in paragraph 6. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 19

Security requirements applicable to trust_service providers

1. Qualified and non-qualified trust_service providers shall take appropriate technical and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the trust_services they provide. Having regard to the latest technological developments, those measures shall ensure that the level of security is commensurate to the degree of risk. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents and inform stakeholders of the adverse effects of any such incidents.

2. Qualified and non-qualified trust_service providers shall, without undue delay but in any event within 24 hours after having become aware of it, notify the supervisory body and, where applicable, other relevant bodies, such as the competent national body for information security or the data protection authority, of any breach of security or loss of integrity that has a significant impact on the trust_service provided or on the personal data maintained therein.

Where the breach of security or loss of integrity is likely to adversely affect a natural or legal person to whom the trusted service has been provided, the trust_service provider shall also notify the natural or legal person of the breach of security or loss of integrity without undue delay.

Where appropriate, in particular if a breach of security or loss of integrity concerns two or more Member States, the notified supervisory body shall inform the supervisory bodies in other Member States concerned and ENISA.

The notified supervisory body shall inform the public or require the trust_service provider to do so, where it determines that disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity is in the public interest.

3. The supervisory body shall provide ENISA once a year with a summary of notifications of breach of security and loss of integrity received from trust_service providers.

4. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts,:

(a)	further specify the measures referred to in paragraph 1; and

(b)	define the formats and procedures, including deadlines, applicable for the purpose of paragraph 2.

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

SECTION 3

Qualified trust_services

Article 20

Supervision of qualified trust_service providers

1. Qualified trust_service providers shall be audited at their own expense at least every 24 months by a conformity_assessment_body. The purpose of the audit shall be to confirm that the qualified trust_service providers and the qualified trust_services provided by them fulfil the requirements laid down in this Regulation. The qualified trust_service providers shall submit the resulting conformity assessment report to the supervisory body within the period of three working days after receiving it.

2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, the supervisory body may at any time audit or request a conformity_assessment_body to perform a conformity assessment of the qualified trust_service providers, at the expense of those trust_service providers, to confirm that they and the qualified trust_services provided by them fulfil the requirements laid down in this Regulation. Where personal data protection rules appear to have been breached, the supervisory body shall inform the data protection authorities of the results of its audits.

3. Where the supervisory body requires the qualified trust_service provider to remedy any failure to fulfil requirements under this Regulation and where that provider does not act accordingly, and if applicable within a time limit set by the supervisory body, the supervisory body, taking into account, in particular, the extent, duration and consequences of that failure, may withdraw the qualified status of that provider or of the affected service it provides and inform the body referred to in Article 22(3) for the purposes of updating the trusted lists referred to in Article 22(1). The supervisory body shall inform the qualified trust_service provider of the withdrawal of its qualified status or of the qualified status of the service concerned.

4. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference number of the following standards:

(a)	accreditation of the conformity assessment bodies and for the conformity assessment report referred to in paragraph 1;

(b)	auditing rules under which conformity assessment bodies will carry out their conformity assessment of the qualified trust_service providers as referred to in paragraph 1.

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 21

Initiation of a qualified trust_service

1. Where trust_service providers, without qualified status, intend to start providing qualified trust_services, they shall submit to the supervisory body a notification of their intention together with a conformity assessment report issued by a conformity_assessment_body.

2. The supervisory body shall verify whether the trust_service provider and the trust_services provided by it comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, and in particular, with the requirements for qualified trust_service providers and for the qualified trust_services they provide.

If the supervisory body concludes that the trust_service provider and the trust_services provided by it comply with the requirements referred to in the first subparagraph, the supervisory body shall grant qualified status to the trust_service provider and the trust_services it provides and inform the body referred to in Article 22(3) for the purposes of updating the trusted lists referred to in Article 22(1), not later than three months after notification in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article.

If the verification is not concluded within three months of notification, the supervisory body shall inform the trust_service provider specifying the reasons for the delay and the period within which the verification is to be concluded.

3. Qualified trust_service providers may begin to provide the qualified trust_service after the qualified status has been indicated in the trusted lists referred to in Article 22(1).

4. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, define the formats and procedures for the purpose of paragraphs 1 and 2. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 22

Trusted lists

1. Each Member State shall establish, maintain and publish trusted lists, including information related to the qualified trust_service providers for which it is responsible, together with information related to the qualified trust_services provided by them.

2. Member States shall establish, maintain and publish, in a secured manner, the electronically signed or sealed trusted lists referred to in paragraph 1 in a form suitable for automated processing.

3. Member States shall notify to the Commission, without undue delay, information on the body responsible for establishing, maintaining and publishing national trusted lists, and details of where such lists are published, the certificates used to sign or seal the trusted lists and any changes thereto.

4. The Commission shall make available to the public, through a secure channel, the information referred to in paragraph 3 in electronically signed or sealed form suitable for automated processing.

5. By 18 September 2015 the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, specify the information referred to in paragraph 1 and define the technical specifications and formats for trusted lists applicable for the purposes of paragraphs 1 to 4. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 23

EU trust mark for qualified trust_services

1. After the qualified status referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 21(2) has been indicated in the trusted list referred to in Article 22(1), qualified trust_service providers may use the EU trust mark to indicate in a simple, recognisable and clear manner the qualified trust_services they provide.

2. When using the EU trust mark for the qualified trust_services referred to in paragraph 1, qualified trust_service providers shall ensure that a link to the relevant trusted list is made available on their website.

3. By 1 July 2015 the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, provide for specifications with regard to the form, and in particular the presentation, composition, size and design of the EU trust mark for qualified trust_services. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 24

Requirements for qualified trust_service providers

1. When issuing a qualified certificate for a trust_service, a qualified trust_service provider shall verify, by appropriate means and in accordance with national law, the identity and, if applicable, any specific attributes of the natural or legal person to whom the qualified certificate is issued.

The information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be verified by the qualified trust_service provider either directly or by relying on a third party in accordance with national law:

(a)	by the physical presence of the natural person or of an authorised representative of the legal person; or

(b)

remotely, using electronic_identification means, for which prior to the issuance of the qualified certificate, a physical presence of the natural person or of an authorised representative of the legal person was ensured and which meets the requirements set out in Article 8 with regard to the assurance levels ‘substantial’ or ‘high’; or

(c)	by means of a certificate of a qualified electronic_signature or of a qualified electronic_seal issued in compliance with point (a) or (b); or

(d)	by using other identification methods recognised at national level which provide equivalent assurance in terms of reliability to physical presence. The equivalent assurance shall be confirmed by a conformity_assessment_body.

2. A qualified trust_service provider providing qualified trust_services shall:

(a)	inform the supervisory body of any change in the provision of its qualified trust_services and an intention to cease those activities;

(b)

employ staff and, if applicable, subcontractors who possess the necessary expertise, reliability, experience, and qualifications and who have received appropriate training regarding security and personal data protection rules and shall apply administrative and management procedures which correspond to European or international standards;

(c)	with regard to the risk of liability for damages in accordance with Article 13, maintain sufficient financial resources and/or obtain appropriate liability insurance, in accordance with national law;

(d)	before entering into a contractual relationship, inform, in a clear and comprehensive manner, any person seeking to use a qualified trust_service of the precise terms and conditions regarding the use of that service, including any limitations on its use;

(e)	use trustworthy systems and products that are protected against modification and ensure the technical security and reliability of the processes supported by them;

(f)

use trustworthy systems to store data provided to it, in a verifiable form so that:

(i)	they are publicly available for retrieval only where the consent of the person to whom the data relates has been obtained,

(ii)	only authorised persons can make entries and changes to the stored data,

(iii)

the data can be checked for authenticity;

(g)	take appropriate measures against forgery and theft of data;

(h)

record and keep accessible for an appropriate period of time, including after the activities of the qualified trust_service provider have ceased, all relevant information concerning data issued and received by the qualified trust_service provider, in particular, for the purpose of providing evidence in legal proceedings and for the purpose of ensuring continuity of the service. Such recording may be done electronically;

(i)	have an up-to-date termination plan to ensure continuity of service in accordance with provisions verified by the supervisory body under point (i) of Article 17(4);

(j)	ensure lawful processing of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC;

(k)	in case of qualified trust_service providers issuing qualified certificates, establish and keep updated a certificate database.

3. If a qualified trust_service provider issuing qualified certificates decides to revoke a certificate, it shall register such revocation in its certificate database and publish the revocation status of the certificate in a timely manner, and in any event within 24 hours after the receipt of the request. The revocation shall become effective immediately upon its publication.

4. With regard to paragraph 3, qualified trust_service providers issuing qualified certificates shall provide to any relying_party information on the validity or revocation status of qualified certificates issued by them. This information shall be made available at least on a per certificate basis at any time and beyond the validity period of the certificate in an automated manner that is reliable, free of charge and efficient.

5. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for trustworthy systems and products, which comply with the requirements under points (e) and (f) of paragraph 2 of this Article. Compliance with the requirements laid down in this Article shall be presumed where trustworthy systems and products meet those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

SECTION 4

Electronic signatures

Article 44

Requirements for qualified electronic_registered_delivery_services

1. Qualified electronic_registered_delivery_services shall meet the following requirements:

(a)	they are provided by one or more qualified trust_service provider(s);

(b)	they ensure with a high level of confidence the identification of the sender;

(c)	they ensure the identification of the addressee before the delivery of the data;

(d)	the sending and receiving of data is secured by an advanced electronic_signature or an advanced electronic_seal of a qualified trust_service provider in such a manner as to preclude the possibility of the data being changed undetectably;

(e)	any change of the data needed for the purpose of sending or receiving the data is clearly indicated to the sender and addressee of the data;

(f)	the date and time of sending, receiving and any change of data are indicated by a qualified electronic_time_stamp.

In the event of the data being transferred between two or more qualified trust_service providers, the requirements in points (a) to (f) shall apply to all the qualified trust_service providers.

2. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for processes for sending and receiving data. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the process for sending and receiving data meets those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

SECTION 8

Website authentication

Article 52

Entry into force

1. This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

2. This Regulation shall apply from 1 July 2016, except for the following:

(a)	Articles 8(3), 9(5), 12(2) to (9), 17(8), 19(4), 20(4), 21(4), 22(5), 23(3), 24(5), 27(4) and (5), 28(6), 29(2), 30(3) and (4), 31(3), 32(3), 33(2), 34(2), 37(4) and (5), 38(6), 42(2), 44(2), 45(2), and Articles 47 and 48 shall apply from 17 September 2014;

(b)	Article 7, Article 8(1) and (2), Articles 9, 10, 11 and Article 12(1) shall apply from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8);

(c)	Article 6 shall apply from three years as from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8).

3. Where the notified electronic_identification scheme is included in the list published by the Commission pursuant to Article 9 before the date referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2 of this Article, the recognition of the electronic_identification means under that scheme pursuant to Article 6 shall take place no later than 12 months after the publication of that scheme but not before the date referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2 of this Article.

4. Notwithstanding point (c) of paragraph 2 of this Article, a Member State may decide that electronic_identification means under electronic_identification scheme notified pursuant to Article 9(1) by another Member State are recognised in the first Member State as from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8). Member States concerned shall inform the Commission. The Commission shall make this information public.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 2014.

For the Parliament

The President

M. SCHULZ

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

(1) OJ C 351, 15.11.2012, p. 73.

(2) Position of the European Parliament of 3 April 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 23 July 2014.

(3) Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic_signatures (OJ L 13, 19.1.2000, p. 12).

(4) OJ C 50 E, 21.2.2012, p. 1.

(5) Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).

(6) Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45).

(7) Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31).

(8) Council Decision 2010/48/EC of 26 November 2009 concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (OJ L 23, 27.1.2010, p. 35).

(9) Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30).

(10) Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 36).

(11) Commission Decision 2011/130/EU of 25 February 2011 establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 53, 26.2.2011, p. 66).

(12) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).

(13) Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).

(14) OJ C 28, 30.1.2013, p. 6.

(15) Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65).

ANNEX I

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES FOR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

Qualified certificates for electronic_signatures shall contain:

(a)	an indication, at least in a form suitable for automated processing, that the certificate has been issued as a qualified certificate for electronic_signature;

(b)

a set of data unambiguously representing the qualified trust_service provider issuing the qualified certificates including at least, the Member State in which that provider is established and:

—	for a legal person: the name and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records,

—	for a natural person: the person’s name;

(c)	at least the name of the signatory, or a pseudonym; if a pseudonym is used, it shall be clearly indicated;

(d)	electronic_signature validation_data that corresponds to the electronic_signature creation data;

(e)	details of the beginning and end of the certificate’s period of validity;

(f)	the certificate identity code, which must be unique for the qualified trust_service provider;

(g)	the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal of the issuing qualified trust_service provider;

(h)	the location where the certificate supporting the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal referred to in point (g) is available free of charge;

(i)	the location of the services that can be used to enquire about the validity status of the qualified certificate;

(j)	where the electronic_signature creation data related to the electronic_signature validation_data is located in a qualified electronic_signature creation device, an appropriate indication of this, at least in a form suitable for automated processing.

ANNEX II

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE CREATION DEVICES

Qualified electronic_signature creation devices shall ensure, by appropriate technical and procedural means, that at least:

(a)	the confidentiality of the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation is reasonably assured;

(b)	the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation can practically occur only once;

(c)	the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation cannot, with reasonable assurance, be derived and the electronic_signature is reliably protected against forgery using currently available technology;

(d)	the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation can be reliably protected by the legitimate signatory against use by others.

Qualified electronic_signature creation devices shall not alter the data to be signed or prevent such data from being presented to the signatory prior to signing.

Generating or managing electronic_signature creation data on behalf of the signatory may only be done by a qualified trust_service provider.

Without prejudice to point (d) of point 1, qualified trust_service providers managing electronic_signature creation data on behalf of the signatory may duplicate the electronic_signature creation data only for back-up purposes provided the following requirements are met:

(a)	the security of the duplicated datasets must be at the same level as for the original datasets;

(b)	the number of duplicated datasets shall not exceed the minimum needed to ensure continuity of the service.

ANNEX III

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES FOR ELECTRONIC SEALS

Qualified certificates for electronic_seals shall contain:

(a)	an indication, at least in a form suitable for automated processing, that the certificate has been issued as a qualified certificate for electronic_seal;

(b)

a set of data unambiguously representing the qualified trust_service provider issuing the qualified certificates including at least the Member State in which that provider is established and:

—	for a legal person: the name and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records,

—	for a natural person: the person’s name;

(c)	at least the name of the creator of the seal and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records;

(d)	electronic_seal validation_data, which corresponds to the electronic_seal creation data;

(e)	details of the beginning and end of the certificate’s period of validity;

(f)	the certificate identity code, which must be unique for the qualified trust_service provider;

(g)	the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal of the issuing qualified trust_service provider;

(h)	the location where the certificate supporting the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal referred to in point (g) is available free of charge;

(i)	the location of the services that can be used to enquire as to the validity status of the qualified certificate;

(j)	where the electronic_seal creation data related to the electronic_seal validation_data is located in a qualified electronic_seal creation device, an appropriate indication of this, at least in a form suitable for automated processing.

ANNEX IV

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES FOR WEBSITE AUTHENTICATION

Qualified certificates for website authentication shall contain:

(a)	an indication, at least in a form suitable for automated processing, that the certificate has been issued as a qualified certificate for website authentication;

(b)

a set of data unambiguously representing the qualified trust_service provider issuing the qualified certificates including at least the Member State in which that provider is established and:

—	for a legal person: the name and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records,

—	for a natural person: the person’s name;

(c)

for natural persons: at least the name of the person to whom the certificate has been issued, or a pseudonym. If a pseudonym is used, it shall be clearly indicated;

for legal persons: at least the name of the legal person to whom the certificate is issued and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records;

(d)	elements of the address, including at least city and State, of the natural or legal person to whom the certificate is issued and, where applicable, as stated in the official records;

(e)	the domain name(s) operated by the natural or legal person to whom the certificate is issued;

(f)	details of the beginning and end of the certificate’s period of validity;

(g)	the certificate identity code, which must be unique for the qualified trust_service provider;

(h)	the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal of the issuing qualified trust_service provider;

(i)	the location where the certificate supporting the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal referred to in point (h) is available free of charge;

(j)	the location of the certificate validity status services that can be used to enquire as to the validity status of the qualified certificate.

whereas

(9) In most cases, citizens cannot use their electronic_identification to authenticate themselves in another Member State because the national electronic_identification schemes in their country are not recognised in other Member States.
That electronic barrier excludes service providers from enjoying the full benefits of the internal market.
Mutually recognised electronic_identification means will facilitate cross-border provision of numerous services in the internal market and enable businesses to operate on a cross-border basis without facing many obstacles in interactions with public authorities.

- = -

(11) This Regulation should be applied in full compliance with the principles relating to the protection of personal data provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (7).
In this respect, having regard to the principle of mutual recognition established by this Regulation, authentication for an online service should concern processing of only those identification data that are adequate, relevant and not excessive to grant access to that service online.
Furthermore, requirements under Directive 95/46/EC concerning confidentiality and security of processing should be respected by trust_service providers and supervisory bodies.

- = -

(31) Supervisory bodies should cooperate with data protection authorities, for example, by informing them about the results of audits of qualified trust_service providers, where personal data protection rules appear to have been breached.
The provision of information should in particular cover security incidents and personal data breaches.

- = -

(32) It should be incumbent on all trust_service providers to apply good security practice appropriate to the risks related to their activities so as to boost users’ trust in the single market.

- = -

(35) All trust_service providers should be subject to the requirements of this Regulation, in particular those on security and liability to ensure due diligence, transparency and accountability of their operations and services.
However, taking into account the type of services provided by trust_service providers, it is appropriate to distinguish as far as those requirements are concerned between qualified and non-qualified trust_service providers.

- = -

(36) Establishing a supervisory regime for all trust_service providers should ensure a level playing field for the security and accountability of their operations and services, thus contributing to the protection of users and to the functioning of the internal market.
Non-qualified trust_service providers should be subject to a light touch and reactive ex post supervisory activities justified by the nature of their services and operations.
The supervisory body should therefore have no general obligation to supervise non-qualified service providers.
The supervisory body should only take action when it is informed (for example, by the non-qualified trust_service provider itself, by another supervisory body, by a notification from a user or a business partner or on the basis of its own investigation) that a non-qualified trust_service provider does not comply with the requirements of this Regulation.

- = -

(37) This Regulation should provide for the liability of all trust_service providers.
In particular, it establishes the liability regime under which all trust_service providers should be liable for damage caused to any natural or legal person due to failure to comply with the obligations under this Regulation.
In order to facilitate the assessment of financial risk that trust_service providers might have to bear or that they should cover by insurance policies, this Regulation allows trust_service providers to set limitations, under certain conditions, on the use of the services they provide and not to be liable for damages arising from the use of services exceeding such limitations.
Customers should be duly informed about the limitations in advance.
Those limitations should be recognisable by a third party, for example by including information about the limitations in the terms and conditions of the service provided or through other recognisable means.
For the purposes of giving effect to those principles, this Regulation should be applied in accordance with national rules on liability.
Therefore, this Regulation does not affect those national rules on, for example, definition of damages, intention, negligence, or relevant applicable procedural rules.

- = -

(41) To ensure sustainability and durability of qualified trust_services and to boost users’ confidence in the continuity of qualified trust_services, supervisory bodies should verify the existence and the correct application of provisions on termination plans in cases where qualified trust_service providers cease their activities.

- = -

(42) To facilitate the supervision of qualified trust_service providers, for example, when a provider is providing its services in the territory of another Member State and is not subject to supervision there, or when the computers of a provider are located in the territory of a Member State other than the one where it is established, a mutual assistance system between supervisory bodies in the Member States should be established.

- = -

(43) In order to ensure the compliance of qualified trust_service providers and the services they provide with the requirements set out in this Regulation, a conformity assessment should be carried out by a conformity_assessment_body and the resulting conformity assessment reports should be submitted by the qualified trust_service providers to the supervisory body.
Whenever the supervisory body requires a qualified trust_service provider to submit an ad hoc conformity assessment report, the supervisory body should respect, in particular, the principles of good administration, including the obligation to give reasons for its decisions, as well as the principle of proportionality.
Therefore, the supervisory body should duly justify its decision to require an ad hoc conformity assessment.

- = -

(45) In order to allow an efficient initiation process, which should lead to the inclusion of qualified trust_service providers and the qualified trust_services they provide into trusted lists, preliminary interactions between prospective qualified trust_service providers and the competent supervisory body should be encouraged with a view to facilitating the due diligence leading to the provisioning of qualified trust_services.

- = -

(47) Confidence in and convenience of online services are essential for users to fully benefit and consciously rely on electronic services.
To this end, an EU trust mark should be created to identify the qualified trust_services provided by qualified trust_service providers.
Such an EU trust mark for qualified trust_services would clearly differentiate qualified trust_services from other trust_services thus contributing to transparency in the market.
The use of an EU trust mark by qualified trust_service providers should be voluntary and should not lead to any requirement other than those provided for in this Regulation.

- = -

(52) The creation of remote electronic_signatures, where the electronic_signature creation environment is managed by a trust_service provider on behalf of the signatory, is set to increase in the light of its multiple economic benefits.
However, in order to ensure that such electronic_signatures receive the same legal recognition as electronic_signatures created in an entirely user-managed environment, remote electronic_signature service providers should apply specific management and administrative security procedures and use trustworthy systems and products, including secure electronic communication channels, in order to guarantee that the electronic_signature creation environment is reliable and is used under the sole control of the signatory.
Where a qualified electronic_signature has been created using a remote electronic_signature creation device, the requirements applicable to qualified trust_service providers set out in this Regulation should apply.

- = -

(53) The suspension of qualified certificates is an established operational practice of trust_service providers in a number of Member States, which is different from revocation and entails the temporary loss of validity of a certificate.
Legal certainty calls for the suspension status of a certificate to always be clearly indicated.
To that end, trust_service providers should have the responsibility to clearly indicate the status of the certificate and, if suspended, the precise period of time during which the certificate has been suspended.
This Regulation should not impose the use of suspension on trust_service providers or Member States, but should provide for transparency rules when and where such a practice is available.

- = -

(57) To ensure legal certainty as regards the validity of the signature, it is essential to specify the components of a qualified electronic_signature, which should be assessed by the relying_party carrying out the validation.
Moreover, specifying the requirements for qualified trust_service providers that can provide a qualified validation service to relying parties unwilling or unable to carry out the validation of qualified electronic_signatures themselves, should stimulate the private and public sector to invest in such services.
Both elements should make qualified electronic_signature validation easy and convenient for all parties at Union level.

- = -

(60) Trust service providers issuing qualified certificates for electronic_seals should implement the necessary measures in order to be able to establish the identity of the natural person representing the legal person to whom the qualified certificate for the electronic_seal is provided, when such identification is necessary at national level in the context of judicial or administrative proceedings.

- = -

(66) It is essential to provide for a legal framework to facilitate cross-border recognition between existing national legal systems related to electronic_registered_delivery_services.
That framework could also open new market opportunities for Union trust_service providers to offer new pan-European electronic_registered_delivery_services.

- = -

(67) Website authentication services provide a means by which a visitor to a website can be assured that there is a genuine and legitimate entity standing behind the website.
Those services contribute to the building of trust and confidence in conducting business online, as users will have confidence in a website that has been authenticated.
The provision and the use of website authentication services are entirely voluntary.
However, in order for website authentication to become a means to boosting trust, providing a better experience for the user and furthering growth in the internal market, this Regulation should lay down minimal security and liability obligations for the providers and their services.
To that end, the results of existing industry-led initiatives, for example the Certification Authorities/Browsers Forum — CA/B Forum, have been taken into account.
In addition, this Regulation should not impede the use of other means or methods to authenticate a website not falling under this Regulation nor should it prevent third country providers of website authentication services from providing their services to customers in the Union.
However, a third country provider should only have its website authentication services recognised as qualified in accordance with this Regulation, if an international agreement between the Union and the country of establishment of the provider has been concluded.

- = -

(74) To ensure legal certainty for market operators already using qualified certificates issued to natural persons in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC, it is necessary to provide for a sufficient period of time for transitional purposes.
Similarly, transitional measures should be established for secure signature creation devices, the conformity of which has been determined in accordance with Directive 1999/93/EC, as well as for certification service providers issuing qualified certificates before 1 July 2016.
Finally, it is also necessary to provide the Commission with the means to adopt the implementing acts and delegated acts before that date.

- = -

keyboard_tab EIDAS 2014/0910 EN

EIDAS 2014/0910 EN