EIDAS 2014/0910 EN

With a view to ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market while aiming at an adequate level of security of electronic_identification means and trust_services this Regulation:

(a)	lays down the conditions under which Member States recognise electronic_identification means of natural and legal persons falling under a notified electronic_identification scheme of another Member State;

(b)	lays down rules for trust_services, in particular for electronic transactions; and

(c)	establishes a legal framework for electronic_signatures, electronic_seals, electronic_time_stamps, electronic_documents, electronic_registered_delivery_services and certificate services for website authentication.

Article 6

Mutual recognition

1. When an electronic_identification using an electronic_identification means and authentication is required under national law or by administrative practice to access a service provided by a public_sector_body online in one Member State, the electronic_identification means issued in another Member State shall be recognised in the first Member State for the purposes of cross-border authentication for that service online, provided that the following conditions are met:

(a)	the electronic_identification means is issued under an electronic_identification scheme that is included in the list published by the Commission pursuant to Article 9;

(b)

the assurance level of the electronic_identification means corresponds to an assurance level equal to or higher than the assurance level required by the relevant public_sector_body to access that service online in the first Member State, provided that the assurance level of that electronic_identification means corresponds to the assurance level substantial or high;

(c)	the relevant public_sector_body uses the assurance level substantial or high in relation to accessing that service online.

Such recognition shall take place no later than 12 months after the Commission publishes the list referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph.

2. An electronic_identification means which is issued under an electronic_identification scheme included in the list published by the Commission pursuant to Article 9 and which corresponds to the assurance level low may be recognised by public sector bodies for the purposes of cross-border authentication for the service provided online by those bodies.

Article 7

Eligibility for notification of electronic_identification schemes

An electronic_identification scheme shall be eligible for notification pursuant to Article 9(1) provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(a)

the electronic_identification means under the electronic_identification scheme are issued:

(i)	by the notifying Member State;

(ii)	under a mandate from the notifying Member State; or

(iii)

independently of the notifying Member State and are recognised by that Member State;

(b)	the electronic_identification means under the electronic_identification scheme can be used to access at least one service which is provided by a public_sector_body and which requires electronic_identification in the notifying Member State;

(c)	the electronic_identification scheme and the electronic_identification means issued thereunder meet the requirements of at least one of the assurance levels set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 8(3);

(d)

the notifying Member State ensures that the person_identification_data uniquely representing the person in question is attributed, in accordance with the technical specifications, standards and procedures for the relevant assurance level set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 8(3), to the natural or legal person referred to in point 1 of Article 3 at the time the electronic_identification means under that scheme is issued;

(e)

the party issuing the electronic_identification means under that scheme ensures that the electronic_identification means is attributed to the person referred to in point (d) of this Article in accordance with the technical specifications, standards and procedures for the relevant assurance level set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 8(3);

(f)

the notifying Member State ensures the availability of authentication online, so that any relying_party established in the territory of another Member State is able to confirm the person_identification_data received in electronic form.

For relying parties other than public sector bodies the notifying Member State may define terms of access to that authentication. The cross-border authentication shall be provided free of charge when it is carried out in relation to a service online provided by a public_sector_body.

Member States shall not impose any specific disproportionate technical requirements on relying parties intending to carry out such authentication, where such requirements prevent or significantly impede the interoperability of the notified electronic_identification schemes;

(g)

at least six months prior to the notification pursuant to Article 9(1), the notifying Member State provides the other Member States for the purposes of the obligation under Article 12(5) a description of that scheme in accordance with the procedural arrangements established by the implementing acts referred to in Article 12(7);

(h)	the electronic_identification scheme meets the requirements set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 12(8).

Article 8

Assurance levels of electronic_identification schemes

1. An electronic_identification scheme notified pursuant to Article 9(1) shall specify assurance levels low, substantial and/or high for electronic_identification means issued under that scheme.

2. The assurance levels low, substantial and high shall meet respectively the following criteria:

(a)

assurance level low shall refer to an electronic_identification means in the context of an electronic_identification scheme, which provides a limited degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted identity of a person, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to decrease the risk of misuse or alteration of the identity;

(b)

assurance level substantial shall refer to an electronic_identification means in the context of an electronic_identification scheme, which provides a substantial degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted identity of a person, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to decrease substantially the risk of misuse or alteration of the identity;

(c)

assurance level high shall refer to an electronic_identification means in the context of an electronic_identification scheme, which provides a higher degree of confidence in the claimed or asserted identity of a person than electronic_identification means with the assurance level substantial, and is characterised with reference to technical specifications, standards and procedures related thereto, including technical controls, the purpose of which is to prevent misuse or alteration of the identity.

3. By 18 September 2015, taking into account relevant international standards and subject to paragraph 2, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, set out minimum technical specifications, standards and procedures with reference to which assurance levels low, substantial and high are specified for electronic_identification means for the purposes of paragraph 1.

Those minimum technical specifications, standards and procedures shall be set out by reference to the reliability and quality of the following elements:

(a)	the procedure to prove and verify the identity of natural or legal persons applying for the issuance of electronic_identification means;

(b)	the procedure for the issuance of the requested electronic_identification means;

(c)	the authentication mechanism, through which the natural or legal person uses the electronic_identification means to confirm its identity to a relying_party;

(d)	the entity issuing the electronic_identification means;

(e)	any other body involved in the application for the issuance of the electronic_identification means; and

(f)	the technical and security specifications of the issued electronic_identification means.

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 9

Notification

1. The notifying Member State shall notify to the Commission the following information and, without undue delay, any subsequent changes thereto:

(a)	a description of the electronic_identification scheme, including its assurance levels and the issuer or issuers of electronic_identification means under the scheme;

(b)

the applicable supervisory regime and information on the liability regime with respect to the following:

(i)	the party issuing the electronic_identification means; and

(ii)	the party operating the authentication procedure;

(c)	the authority or authorities responsible for the electronic_identification scheme;

(d)	information on the entity or entities which manage the registration of the unique person_identification_data;

(e)	a description of how the requirements set out in the implementing acts referred to in Article 12(8) are met;

(f)	a description of the authentication referred to in point (f) of Article 7;

(g)	arrangements for suspension or revocation of either the notified electronic_identification scheme or authentication or the compromised parts concerned.

2. One year from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8), the Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union a list of the electronic_identification schemes which were notified pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article and the basic information thereon.

3. If the Commission receives a notification after the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 2, it shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union the amendments to the list referred to in paragraph 2 within two months from the date of receipt of that notification.

4. A Member State may submit to the Commission a request to remove an electronic_identification scheme notified by that Member State from the list referred to in paragraph 2. The Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union the corresponding amendments to the list within one month from the date of receipt of the Member State’s request.

5. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, define the circumstances, formats and procedures of notifications under paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 12

Cooperation and interoperability

1. The national electronic_identification schemes notified pursuant to Article 9(1) shall be interoperable.

2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, an interoperability framework shall be established.

3. The interoperability framework shall meet the following criteria:

(a)	it aims to be technology neutral and does not discriminate between any specific national technical solutions for electronic_identification within a Member State;

(b)	it follows European and international standards, where possible;

(c)	it facilitates the implementation of the principle of privacy by design; and

(d)	it ensures that personal data is processed in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC.

4. The interoperability framework shall consist of:

(a)	a reference to minimum technical requirements related to the assurance levels under Article 8;

(b)	a mapping of national assurance levels of notified electronic_identification schemes to the assurance levels under Article 8;

(c)	a reference to minimum technical requirements for interoperability;

(d)	a reference to a minimum set of person_identification_data uniquely representing a natural or legal person, which is available from electronic_identification schemes;

(e)	rules of procedure;

(f)	arrangements for dispute resolution; and

(g)	common operational security standards.

5. Member States shall cooperate with regard to the following:

(a)	the interoperability of the electronic_identification schemes notified pursuant to Article 9(1) and the electronic_identification schemes which Member States intend to notify; and

(b)	the security of the electronic_identification schemes.

6. The cooperation between Member States shall consist of:

(a)	the exchange of information, experience and good practice as regards electronic_identification schemes and in particular technical requirements related to interoperability and assurance levels;

(b)	the exchange of information, experience and good practice as regards working with assurance levels of electronic_identification schemes under Article 8;

(c)	peer review of electronic_identification schemes falling under this Regulation; and

(d)	examination of relevant developments in the electronic_identification sector.

7. By 18 March 2015, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish the necessary procedural arrangements to facilitate the cooperation between the Member States referred to in paragraphs 5 and 6 with a view to fostering a high level of trust and security appropriate to the degree of risk.

8. By 18 September 2015, for the purpose of setting uniform conditions for the implementation of the requirement under paragraph 1, the Commission shall, subject to the criteria set out in paragraph 3 and taking into account the results of the cooperation between Member States, adopt implementing acts on the interoperability framework as set out in paragraph 4.

9. The implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 7 and 8 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

CHAPTER III

TRUST SERVICES

SECTION 1

General provisions

Article 19

Security requirements applicable to trust_service providers

1. Qualified and non-qualified trust_service providers shall take appropriate technical and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of the trust_services they provide. Having regard to the latest technological developments, those measures shall ensure that the level of security is commensurate to the degree of risk. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and minimise the impact of security incidents and inform stakeholders of the adverse effects of any such incidents.

2. Qualified and non-qualified trust_service providers shall, without undue delay but in any event within 24 hours after having become aware of it, notify the supervisory body and, where applicable, other relevant bodies, such as the competent national body for information security or the data protection authority, of any breach of security or loss of integrity that has a significant impact on the trust_service provided or on the personal data maintained therein.

Where the breach of security or loss of integrity is likely to adversely affect a natural or legal person to whom the trusted service has been provided, the trust_service provider shall also notify the natural or legal person of the breach of security or loss of integrity without undue delay.

Where appropriate, in particular if a breach of security or loss of integrity concerns two or more Member States, the notified supervisory body shall inform the supervisory bodies in other Member States concerned and ENISA.

The notified supervisory body shall inform the public or require the trust_service provider to do so, where it determines that disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity is in the public interest.

3. The supervisory body shall provide ENISA once a year with a summary of notifications of breach of security and loss of integrity received from trust_service providers.

4. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts,:

(a)	further specify the measures referred to in paragraph 1; and

(b)	define the formats and procedures, including deadlines, applicable for the purpose of paragraph 2.

Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

SECTION 3

Qualified trust_services

Article 24

Requirements for qualified trust_service providers

1. When issuing a qualified certificate for a trust_service, a qualified trust_service provider shall verify, by appropriate means and in accordance with national law, the identity and, if applicable, any specific attributes of the natural or legal person to whom the qualified certificate is issued.

The information referred to in the first subparagraph shall be verified by the qualified trust_service provider either directly or by relying on a third party in accordance with national law:

(a)	by the physical presence of the natural person or of an authorised representative of the legal person; or

(b)

remotely, using electronic_identification means, for which prior to the issuance of the qualified certificate, a physical presence of the natural person or of an authorised representative of the legal person was ensured and which meets the requirements set out in Article 8 with regard to the assurance levels ‘substantial’ or ‘high’; or

(c)	by means of a certificate of a qualified electronic_signature or of a qualified electronic_seal issued in compliance with point (a) or (b); or

(d)	by using other identification methods recognised at national level which provide equivalent assurance in terms of reliability to physical presence. The equivalent assurance shall be confirmed by a conformity_assessment_body.

2. A qualified trust_service provider providing qualified trust_services shall:

(a)	inform the supervisory body of any change in the provision of its qualified trust_services and an intention to cease those activities;

(b)

employ staff and, if applicable, subcontractors who possess the necessary expertise, reliability, experience, and qualifications and who have received appropriate training regarding security and personal data protection rules and shall apply administrative and management procedures which correspond to European or international standards;

(c)	with regard to the risk of liability for damages in accordance with Article 13, maintain sufficient financial resources and/or obtain appropriate liability insurance, in accordance with national law;

(d)	before entering into a contractual relationship, inform, in a clear and comprehensive manner, any person seeking to use a qualified trust_service of the precise terms and conditions regarding the use of that service, including any limitations on its use;

(e)	use trustworthy systems and products that are protected against modification and ensure the technical security and reliability of the processes supported by them;

(f)

use trustworthy systems to store data provided to it, in a verifiable form so that:

(i)	they are publicly available for retrieval only where the consent of the person to whom the data relates has been obtained,

(ii)	only authorised persons can make entries and changes to the stored data,

(iii)

the data can be checked for authenticity;

(g)	take appropriate measures against forgery and theft of data;

(h)

record and keep accessible for an appropriate period of time, including after the activities of the qualified trust_service provider have ceased, all relevant information concerning data issued and received by the qualified trust_service provider, in particular, for the purpose of providing evidence in legal proceedings and for the purpose of ensuring continuity of the service. Such recording may be done electronically;

(i)	have an up-to-date termination plan to ensure continuity of service in accordance with provisions verified by the supervisory body under point (i) of Article 17(4);

(j)	ensure lawful processing of personal data in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC;

(k)	in case of qualified trust_service providers issuing qualified certificates, establish and keep updated a certificate database.

3. If a qualified trust_service provider issuing qualified certificates decides to revoke a certificate, it shall register such revocation in its certificate database and publish the revocation status of the certificate in a timely manner, and in any event within 24 hours after the receipt of the request. The revocation shall become effective immediately upon its publication.

4. With regard to paragraph 3, qualified trust_service providers issuing qualified certificates shall provide to any relying_party information on the validity or revocation status of qualified certificates issued by them. This information shall be made available at least on a per certificate basis at any time and beyond the validity period of the certificate in an automated manner that is reliable, free of charge and efficient.

5. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for trustworthy systems and products, which comply with the requirements under points (e) and (f) of paragraph 2 of this Article. Compliance with the requirements laid down in this Article shall be presumed where trustworthy systems and products meet those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

SECTION 4

Electronic signatures

Article 26

Requirements for advanced electronic_signatures

An advanced electronic_signature shall meet the following requirements:

(a)	it is uniquely linked to the signatory;

(b)	it is capable of identifying the signatory;

(c)	it is created using electronic_signature creation data that the signatory can, with a high level of confidence, use under his sole control; and

(d)	it is linked to the data signed therewith in such a way that any subsequent change in the data is detectable.

Article 27

Electronic signatures in public services

1. If a Member State requires an advanced electronic_signature to use an online service offered by, or on behalf of, a public_sector_body, that Member State shall recognise advanced electronic_signatures, advanced electronic_signatures based on a qualified certificate for electronic_signatures, and qualified electronic_signatures in at least the formats or using methods defined in the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5.

2. If a Member State requires an advanced electronic_signature based on a qualified certificate to use an online service offered by, or on behalf of, a public_sector_body, that Member State shall recognise advanced electronic_signatures based on a qualified certificate and qualified electronic_signatures in at least the formats or using methods defined in the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5.

3. Member States shall not request for cross-border use in an online service offered by a public_sector_body an electronic_signature at a higher security level than the qualified electronic_signature.

4. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for advanced electronic_signatures. Compliance with the requirements for advanced electronic_signatures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article and in Article 26 shall be presumed when an advanced electronic_signature meets those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

5. By 18 September 2015, and taking into account existing practices, standards and Union legal acts, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, define reference formats of advanced electronic_signatures or reference methods where alternative formats are used. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 30

Certification of qualified electronic_signature creation devices

1. Conformity of qualified electronic_signature creation devices with the requirements laid down in Annex II shall be certified by appropriate public or private bodies designated by Member States.

2. Member States shall notify to the Commission the names and addresses of the public or private body referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall make that information available to Member States.

3. The certification referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on one of the following:

(a)	a security evaluation process carried out in accordance with one of the standards for the security assessment of information technology products included in the list established in accordance with the second subparagraph; or

(b)

a process other than the process referred to in point (a), provided that it uses comparable security levels and provided that the public or private body referred to in paragraph 1 notifies that process to the Commission. That process may be used only in the absence of standards referred to in point (a) or when a security evaluation process referred to in point (a) is ongoing.

The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of standards for the security assessment of information technology products referred to in point (a). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 47 concerning the establishment of specific criteria to be met by the designated bodies referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.

Article 36

Requirements for advanced electronic_seals

An advanced electronic_seal shall meet the following requirements:

(a)	it is uniquely linked to the creator of the seal;

(b)	it is capable of identifying the creator of the seal;

(c)	it is created using electronic_seal creation data that the creator of the seal can, with a high level of confidence under its control, use for electronic_seal creation; and

(d)	it is linked to the data to which it relates in such a way that any subsequent change in the data is detectable.

Article 37

Electronic seals in public services

1. If a Member State requires an advanced electronic_seal in order to use an online service offered by, or on behalf of, a public_sector_body, that Member State shall recognise advanced electronic_seals, advanced electronic_seals based on a qualified certificate for electronic_seals and qualified electronic_seals at least in the formats or using methods defined in the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5.

2. If a Member State requires an advanced electronic_seal based on a qualified certificate in order to use an online service offered by, or on behalf of, a public_sector_body, that Member State shall recognise advanced electronic_seals based on a qualified certificate and qualified electronic_seal at least in the formats or using methods defined in the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 5.

3. Member States shall not request for the cross-border use in an online service offered by a public_sector_body an electronic_seal at a higher security level than the qualified electronic_seal.

4. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for advanced electronic_seals. Compliance with the requirements for advanced electronic_seals referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article and Article 36 shall be presumed when an advanced electronic_seal meets those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

5. By 18 September 2015, and taking into account existing practices, standards and legal acts of the Union, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, define reference formats of advanced electronic_seals or reference methods where alternative formats are used. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 44

Requirements for qualified electronic_registered_delivery_services

1. Qualified electronic_registered_delivery_services shall meet the following requirements:

(a)	they are provided by one or more qualified trust_service provider(s);

(b)	they ensure with a high level of confidence the identification of the sender;

(c)	they ensure the identification of the addressee before the delivery of the data;

(d)	the sending and receiving of data is secured by an advanced electronic_signature or an advanced electronic_seal of a qualified trust_service provider in such a manner as to preclude the possibility of the data being changed undetectably;

(e)	any change of the data needed for the purpose of sending or receiving the data is clearly indicated to the sender and addressee of the data;

(f)	the date and time of sending, receiving and any change of data are indicated by a qualified electronic_time_stamp.

In the event of the data being transferred between two or more qualified trust_service providers, the requirements in points (a) to (f) shall apply to all the qualified trust_service providers.

2. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for processes for sending and receiving data. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the process for sending and receiving data meets those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

SECTION 8

Website authentication

Article 52

Entry into force

1. This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

2. This Regulation shall apply from 1 July 2016, except for the following:

(a)	Articles 8(3), 9(5), 12(2) to (9), 17(8), 19(4), 20(4), 21(4), 22(5), 23(3), 24(5), 27(4) and (5), 28(6), 29(2), 30(3) and (4), 31(3), 32(3), 33(2), 34(2), 37(4) and (5), 38(6), 42(2), 44(2), 45(2), and Articles 47 and 48 shall apply from 17 September 2014;

(b)	Article 7, Article 8(1) and (2), Articles 9, 10, 11 and Article 12(1) shall apply from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8);

(c)	Article 6 shall apply from three years as from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8).

3. Where the notified electronic_identification scheme is included in the list published by the Commission pursuant to Article 9 before the date referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2 of this Article, the recognition of the electronic_identification means under that scheme pursuant to Article 6 shall take place no later than 12 months after the publication of that scheme but not before the date referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2 of this Article.

4. Notwithstanding point (c) of paragraph 2 of this Article, a Member State may decide that electronic_identification means under electronic_identification scheme notified pursuant to Article 9(1) by another Member State are recognised in the first Member State as from the date of application of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(3) and 12(8). Member States concerned shall inform the Commission. The Commission shall make this information public.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 2014.

For the Parliament

The President

M. SCHULZ

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

(1) OJ C 351, 15.11.2012, p. 73.

(2) Position of the European Parliament of 3 April 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 23 July 2014.

(3) Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic_signatures (OJ L 13, 19.1.2000, p. 12).

(4) OJ C 50 E, 21.2.2012, p. 1.

(5) Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p. 36).

(6) Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45).

(7) Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31).

(8) Council Decision 2010/48/EC of 26 November 2009 concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (OJ L 23, 27.1.2010, p. 35).

(9) Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30).

(10) Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 274, 20.10.2009, p. 36).

(11) Commission Decision 2011/130/EU of 25 February 2011 establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 53, 26.2.2011, p. 66).

(12) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).

(13) Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).

(14) OJ C 28, 30.1.2013, p. 6.

(15) Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65).

ANNEX I

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES FOR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

Qualified certificates for electronic_signatures shall contain:

(a)	an indication, at least in a form suitable for automated processing, that the certificate has been issued as a qualified certificate for electronic_signature;

(b)

a set of data unambiguously representing the qualified trust_service provider issuing the qualified certificates including at least, the Member State in which that provider is established and:

—	for a legal person: the name and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records,

—	for a natural person: the person’s name;

(c)	at least the name of the signatory, or a pseudonym; if a pseudonym is used, it shall be clearly indicated;

(d)	electronic_signature validation_data that corresponds to the electronic_signature creation data;

(e)	details of the beginning and end of the certificate’s period of validity;

(f)	the certificate identity code, which must be unique for the qualified trust_service provider;

(g)	the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal of the issuing qualified trust_service provider;

(h)	the location where the certificate supporting the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal referred to in point (g) is available free of charge;

(i)	the location of the services that can be used to enquire about the validity status of the qualified certificate;

(j)	where the electronic_signature creation data related to the electronic_signature validation_data is located in a qualified electronic_signature creation device, an appropriate indication of this, at least in a form suitable for automated processing.

ANNEX II

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE CREATION DEVICES

Qualified electronic_signature creation devices shall ensure, by appropriate technical and procedural means, that at least:

(a)	the confidentiality of the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation is reasonably assured;

(b)	the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation can practically occur only once;

(c)	the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation cannot, with reasonable assurance, be derived and the electronic_signature is reliably protected against forgery using currently available technology;

(d)	the electronic_signature creation data used for electronic_signature creation can be reliably protected by the legitimate signatory against use by others.

Qualified electronic_signature creation devices shall not alter the data to be signed or prevent such data from being presented to the signatory prior to signing.

Generating or managing electronic_signature creation data on behalf of the signatory may only be done by a qualified trust_service provider.

Without prejudice to point (d) of point 1, qualified trust_service providers managing electronic_signature creation data on behalf of the signatory may duplicate the electronic_signature creation data only for back-up purposes provided the following requirements are met:

(a)	the security of the duplicated datasets must be at the same level as for the original datasets;

(b)	the number of duplicated datasets shall not exceed the minimum needed to ensure continuity of the service.

ANNEX III

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES FOR ELECTRONIC SEALS

Qualified certificates for electronic_seals shall contain:

(a)	an indication, at least in a form suitable for automated processing, that the certificate has been issued as a qualified certificate for electronic_seal;

(b)

a set of data unambiguously representing the qualified trust_service provider issuing the qualified certificates including at least the Member State in which that provider is established and:

—	for a legal person: the name and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records,

—	for a natural person: the person’s name;

(c)	at least the name of the creator of the seal and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records;

(d)	electronic_seal validation_data, which corresponds to the electronic_seal creation data;

(e)	details of the beginning and end of the certificate’s period of validity;

(f)	the certificate identity code, which must be unique for the qualified trust_service provider;

(g)	the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal of the issuing qualified trust_service provider;

(h)	the location where the certificate supporting the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal referred to in point (g) is available free of charge;

(i)	the location of the services that can be used to enquire as to the validity status of the qualified certificate;

(j)	where the electronic_seal creation data related to the electronic_seal validation_data is located in a qualified electronic_seal creation device, an appropriate indication of this, at least in a form suitable for automated processing.

ANNEX IV

REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED CERTIFICATES FOR WEBSITE AUTHENTICATION

Qualified certificates for website authentication shall contain:

(a)	an indication, at least in a form suitable for automated processing, that the certificate has been issued as a qualified certificate for website authentication;

(b)

a set of data unambiguously representing the qualified trust_service provider issuing the qualified certificates including at least the Member State in which that provider is established and:

—	for a legal person: the name and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records,

—	for a natural person: the person’s name;

(c)

for natural persons: at least the name of the person to whom the certificate has been issued, or a pseudonym. If a pseudonym is used, it shall be clearly indicated;

for legal persons: at least the name of the legal person to whom the certificate is issued and, where applicable, registration number as stated in the official records;

(d)	elements of the address, including at least city and State, of the natural or legal person to whom the certificate is issued and, where applicable, as stated in the official records;

(e)	the domain name(s) operated by the natural or legal person to whom the certificate is issued;

(f)	details of the beginning and end of the certificate’s period of validity;

(g)	the certificate identity code, which must be unique for the qualified trust_service provider;

(h)	the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal of the issuing qualified trust_service provider;

(i)	the location where the certificate supporting the advanced electronic_signature or advanced electronic_seal referred to in point (h) is available free of charge;

(j)	the location of the certificate validity status services that can be used to enquire as to the validity status of the qualified certificate.

whereas

(7) The European Parliament, in its resolution of 21 September 2010 on completing the internal market for e-commerce (4), stressed the importance of the security of electronic services, especially of electronic_signatures, and of the need to create a public key infrastructure at pan-European level, and called on the Commission to set up a European validation authorities gateway to ensure the cross-border interoperability of electronic_signatures and to increase the security of transactions carried out using the internet.

- = -

(13) Member States should remain free to use or to introduce means for the purposes of electronic_identification for accessing online services.
They should also be able to decide whether to involve the private sector in the provision of those means.
Member States should not be obliged to notify their electronic_identification schemes to the Commission.
The choice to notify the Commission of all, some or none of the electronic_identification schemes used at national level to access at least public online services or specific services is up to Member States.

- = -

(15) The obligation to recognise electronic_identification means should relate only to those means the identity assurance level of which corresponds to the level equal to or higher than the level required for the online service in question.
In addition, that obligation should only apply when the public_sector_body in question uses the assurance level ‘substantial’ or ‘high’ in relation to accessing that service online.
Member States should remain free, in accordance with Union law, to recognise electronic_identification means having lower identity assurance levels.

- = -

(16) Assurance levels should characterise the degree of confidence in electronic_identification means in establishing the identity of a person, thus providing assurance that the person claiming a particular identity is in fact the person to which that identity was assigned.
The assurance level depends on the degree of confidence that electronic_identification means provides in claimed or asserted identity of a person taking into account processes (for example, identity proofing and verification, and authentication), management activities (for example, the entity issuing electronic_identification means and the procedure to issue such means) and technical controls implemented.
Various technical definitions and descriptions of assurance levels exist as the result of Union-funded Large-Scale Pilots, standardisation and international activities.
In particular, the Large-Scale Pilot STORK and ISO 29115 refer, inter alia, to levels 2, 3 and 4, which should be taken into utmost account in establishing minimum technical requirements, standards and procedures for the assurances levels low, substantial and high within the meaning of this Regulation, while ensuring consistent application of this Regulation in particular with regard to assurance level high related to identity proofing for issuing qualified certificates.
The requirements established should be technology-neutral.
It should be possible to achieve the necessary security requirements through different technologies.

- = -

(19) The security of electronic_identification schemes is key to trustworthy cross-border mutual recognition of electronic_identification means.
In this context, Member States should cooperate with regard to the security and interoperability of the electronic_identification schemes at Union level.
Whenever electronic_identification schemes require specific hardware or software to be used by relying parties at the national level, cross-border interoperability calls for those Member States not to impose such requirements and related costs on relying parties established outside of their territory.
In that case appropriate solutions should be discussed and developed within the scope of the interoperability framework.
Nevertheless technical requirements stemming from the inherent specifications of national electronic_identification means and likely to affect the holders of such electronic means (e.g.
smartcards), are unavoidable.

- = -

(20) Cooperation by Member States should facilitate the technical interoperability of the notified electronic_identification schemes with a view to fostering a high level of trust and security appropriate to the degree of risk.
The exchange of information and the sharing of best practices between Member States with a view to their mutual recognition should help such cooperation.

- = -

(25) Member States should remain free to define other types of trust_services in addition to those making part of the closed list of trust_services provided for in this Regulation, for the purpose of recognition at national level as qualified trust_services.

- = -

(28) To enhance in particular the trust of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and consumers in the internal market and to promote the use of trust_services and products, the notions of qualified trust_services and qualified trust_service provider should be introduced with a view to indicating requirements and obligations that ensure high-level security of whatever qualified trust_services and products are used or provided.

- = -

(34) All Member States should follow common essential supervision requirements to ensure a comparable security level of qualified trust_services.
To ease the consistent application of those requirements across the Union, Member States should adopt comparable procedures and should exchange information on their supervision activities and best practices in the field.

- = -

(36) Establishing a supervisory regime for all trust_service providers should ensure a level playing field for the security and accountability of their operations and services, thus contributing to the protection of users and to the functioning of the internal market.
Non-qualified trust_service providers should be subject to a light touch and reactive ex post supervisory activities justified by the nature of their services and operations.
The supervisory body should therefore have no general obligation to supervise non-qualified service providers.
The supervisory body should only take action when it is informed (for example, by the non-qualified trust_service provider itself, by another supervisory body, by a notification from a user or a business partner or on the basis of its own investigation) that a non-qualified trust_service provider does not comply with the requirements of this Regulation.

- = -

(44) This Regulation aims to ensure a coherent framework with a view to providing a high level of security and legal certainty of trust_services.
In this regard, when addressing the conformity assessment of products and services, the Commission should, where appropriate, seek synergies with existing relevant European and international schemes such as the Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) which sets out the requirements for accreditation of conformity assessment bodies and market surveillance of products.

- = -

(48) While a high level of security is needed to ensure mutual recognition of electronic_signatures, in specific cases, such as in the context of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC (10), electronic_signatures with a lower security assurance should also be accepted.

- = -

(54) Cross-border interoperability and recognition of qualified certificates is a precondition for cross-border recognition of qualified electronic_signatures.
Therefore, qualified certificates should not be subject to any mandatory requirements exceeding the requirements laid down in this Regulation.
However, at national level, the inclusion of specific attributes, such as unique identifiers, in qualified certificates should be allowed, provided that such specific attributes do not hamper cross-border interoperability and recognition of qualified certificates and electronic_signatures.

- = -

(55) IT security certification based on international standards such as ISO 15408 and related evaluation methods and mutual recognition arrangements is an important tool for verifying the security of qualified electronic_signature creation devices and should be promoted.
However, innovative solutions and services such as mobile signing and cloud signing rely on technical and organisational solutions for qualified electronic_signature creation devices for which security standards may not yet be available or for which the first IT security certification is ongoing.
The level of security of such qualified electronic_signature creation devices could be evaluated by using alternative processes only where such security standards are not available or where the first IT security certification is ongoing.
Those processes should be comparable to the standards for IT security certification insofar as their security levels are equivalent.
Those processes could be facilitated by a peer review.

- = -

(57) To ensure legal certainty as regards the validity of the signature, it is essential to specify the components of a qualified electronic_signature, which should be assessed by the relying_party carrying out the validation.
Moreover, specifying the requirements for qualified trust_service providers that can provide a qualified validation service to relying parties unwilling or unable to carry out the validation of qualified electronic_signatures themselves, should stimulate the private and public sector to invest in such services.
Both elements should make qualified electronic_signature validation easy and convenient for all parties at Union level.

- = -

(60) Trust service providers issuing qualified certificates for electronic_seals should implement the necessary measures in order to be able to establish the identity of the natural person representing the legal person to whom the qualified certificate for the electronic_seal is provided, when such identification is necessary at national level in the context of judicial or administrative proceedings.

- = -

(62) In order to ensure the security of qualified electronic_time_stamps, this Regulation should require the use of an advanced electronic_seal or an advanced electronic_signature or of other equivalent methods.
It is foreseeable that innovation may lead to new technologies that may ensure an equivalent level of security for time stamps.
Whenever a method other than an advanced electronic_seal or an advanced electronic_signature is used, it should be up to the qualified trust_service provider to demonstrate, in the conformity assessment report, that such a method ensures an equivalent level of security and complies with the obligations set out in this Regulation.

- = -

(70) In order to complement certain detailed technical aspects of this Regulation in a flexible and rapid manner, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of criteria to be met by the bodies responsible for the certification of qualified electronic_signature creation devices.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.

- = -

(72) When adopting delegated or implementing acts, the Commission should take due account of the standards and technical specifications drawn up by European and international standardisation organisations and bodies, in particular the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), with a view to ensuring a high level of security and interoperability of electronic_identification and trust_services.

- = -

(76) Since the objectives of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.

- = -

keyboard_tab EIDAS 2014/0910 EN

EIDAS 2014/0910 EN