search


keyboard_tab EIDAS 2014/0910 EN

BG CS DA DE EL EN ES ET FI FR GA HR HU IT LV LT MT NL PL PT RO SK SL SV print pdf

2014/0910 EN cercato: 'correct' . Output generated live by software developed by IusOnDemand srl


just index correct:


whereas correct:


definitions:


cloud tag: and the number of total unique words without stopwords is: 266

 

Article 11

Liability

1.   The notifying Member State shall be liable for damage caused intentionally or negligently to any natural or legal person due to a failure to comply with its obligations under points (d) and (f) of Article 7 in a cross-border transaction.

2.   The party issuing the electronic_identification means shall be liable for damage caused intentionally or negligently to any natural or legal person due to a failure to comply with the obligation referred to in point (e) of Article 7 in a cross-border transaction.

3.   The party operating the authentication procedure shall be liable for damage caused intentionally or negligently to any natural or legal person due to a failure to ensure the correct operation of the authentication referred to in point (f) of Article 7 in a cross-border transaction.

4.   Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall be applied in accordance with national rules on liability.

5.   Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are without prejudice to the liability under national law of parties to a transaction in which electronic_identification means falling under the electronic_identification scheme notified pursuant to Article 9(1) are used.

Article 17

Supervisory body

1.   Member States shall designate a supervisory body established in their territory or, upon mutual agreement with another Member State, a supervisory body established in that other Member State. That body shall be responsible for supervisory tasks in the designating Member State.

Supervisory bodies shall be given the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks.

2.   Member States shall notify to the Commission the names and the addresses of their respective designated supervisory bodies.

3.   The role of the supervisory body shall be the following:

(a)

to supervise qualified trust_service providers established in the territory of the designating Member State to ensure, through ex ante and ex post supervisory activities, that those qualified trust_service providers and the qualified trust_services that they provide meet the requirements laid down in this Regulation;

(b)

to take action if necessary, in relation to non-qualified trust_service providers established in the territory of the designating Member State, through ex post supervisory activities, when informed that those non-qualified trust_service providers or the trust_services they provide allegedly do not meet the requirements laid down in this Regulation.

4.   For the purposes of paragraph 3 and subject to the limitations provided therein, the tasks of the supervisory body shall include in particular:

(a)

to cooperate with other supervisory bodies and provide them with assistance in accordance with Article 18;

(b)

to analyse the conformity assessment reports referred to in Articles 20(1) and 21(1);

(c)

to inform other supervisory bodies and the public about breaches of security or loss of integrity in accordance with Article 19(2);

(d)

to report to the Commission about its main activities in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article;

(e)

to carry out audits or request a conformity_assessment_body to perform a conformity assessment of the qualified trust_service providers in accordance with Article 20(2);

(f)

to cooperate with the data protection authorities, in particular, by informing them without undue delay, about the results of audits of qualified trust_service providers, where personal data protection rules appear to have been breached;

(g)

to grant qualified status to trust_service providers and to the services they provide and to withdraw this status in accordance with Articles 20 and 21;

(h)

to inform the body responsible for the national trusted list referred to in Article 22(3) about its decisions to grant or to withdraw qualified status, unless that body is also the supervisory body;

(i)

to verify the existence and correct application of provisions on termination plans in cases where the qualified trust_service provider ceases its activities, including how information is kept accessible in accordance with point (h) of Article 24(2);

(j)

to require that trust_service providers remedy any failure to fulfil the requirements laid down in this Regulation.

5.   Member States may require the supervisory body to establish, maintain and update a trust infrastructure in accordance with the conditions under national law.

6.   By 31 March each year, each supervisory body shall submit to the Commission a report on its previous calendar year’s main activities together with a summary of breach notifications received from trust_service providers in accordance with Article 19(2).

7.   The Commission shall make the annual report referred to in paragraph 6 available to Member States.

8.   The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, define the formats and procedures for the report referred to in paragraph 6. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 32

Requirements for the validation of qualified electronic_signatures

1.   The process for the validation of a qualified electronic_signature shall confirm the validity of a qualified electronic_signature provided that:

(a)

the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic_signature complying with Annex I;

(b)

the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust_service provider and was valid at the time of signing;

(c)

the signature validation_data corresponds to the data provided to the relying_party;

(d)

the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying_party;

(e)

the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying_party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing;

(f)

the electronic_signature was created by a qualified electronic_signature creation device;

(g)

the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised;

(h)

the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing.

2.   The system used for validating the qualified electronic_signature shall provide to the relying_party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying_party to detect any security relevant issues.

3.   The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, establish reference numbers of standards for the validation of qualified electronic_signatures. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the validation of qualified electronic_signatures meets those standards. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Article 35

Legal effects of electronic_seals

1.   An electronic_seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic_seals.

2.   A qualified electronic_seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic_seal is linked.

3.   A qualified electronic_seal based on a qualified certificate issued in one Member State shall be recognised as a qualified electronic_seal in all other Member States.


whereas









keyboard_arrow_down