(2) Article 26(1) and (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provide that the Union is to adopt measures with the aim of establishing or ensuring the functioning of the internal market, which is to comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods and services is ensured.
Article 169(1) and point (a) of Article 169(2) TFEU provide that the Union is to contribute to the attainment of a high level of consumer protection through measures adopted pursuant to Article 114 TFEU in the context of the completion of the internal market. Ī¤his Directive aims to strike the right balance between achieving a high level of consumer protection and promoting the competitiveness of enterprises, while ensuring respect for the principle of subsidiarity.
- = -
(8) while consumers enjoy a high level of protection when they purchase from abroad as a result of the application of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008, legal fragmentation also negatively affects consumers' levels of confidence in cross-border transactions.
while several factors contribute to this mistrust, uncertainty about key contractual rights ranks prominently among consumers' concerns.
This uncertainty exists independently of whether or not consumers are protected by the mandatory consumer contract law rules of their own Member State in the event that sellers direct their cross-border activities to them, or of whether or not consumers conclude cross-border contracts with sellers without the respective seller pursuing commercial activities in the consumer's Member State.
- = -
(9) while online sales of goods constitute the vast majority of cross-border sales in the Union, differences in national contract laws equally affect retailers using distance sales channels and retailers selling face-to-face and prevent them from expanding across borders.
This Directive should cover all sales channels, in order to create a level playing field for all businesses selling goods to consumers.
By laying down uniform rules across sales channels, this Directive should avoid any divergence that would create disproportionate burdens for the growing number of omni-channel retailers in the Union.
The need for retaining consistent rules on sales and guarantees for all sales channels was confirmed in the Commission's Fitness Check on consumer and marketing law published on 29 May 2017, which also covered Directive 1999/44/EC.
- = -
(11) This Directive complements Directive 2011/83/EU.
while Directive 2011/83/EU mainly lays down provisions regarding pre-contractual information requirements, the right of withdrawal from distance and off-premises contracts and rules on delivery and passing of risk, this Directive introduces rules on conformity of the goods, remedies in the event of a lack of conformity and modalities for their exercise.
- = -
(13) This Directive and Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the CouncilĀ (6) should complement each other.
while Directive (EU) 2019/770 lays down rules on certain requirements concerning contracts for the supply of digital_content or digital_services, this Directive lays down rules on certain requirements concerning contracts for the sale of goods.
Accordingly, in order to meet the expectations of consumers and ensure a clear-cut and simple legal framework for traders of digital_content or digital_services, Directive (EU) 2019/770 applies to the supply of digital_content or digital_services, including digital_content supplied on a tangible medium, such as DVDs, CDs, USB sticks and memory cards, as well as to the tangible medium itself, provided that the tangible medium serves exclusively as a carrier of the digital_content.
In contrast, this Directive should apply to contracts for the sale of goods, including goods with digital elements which require digital_content or a digital_service in order to perform their functions.
- = -
(16) In contrast, if the absence of the incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_service does not prevent the goods from performing their functions, or if the consumer concludes a contract for the supply of digital_content or a digital_service which does not form part of the contract concerning the sale of goods with digital elements, that contract should be considered to be separate from the contract for the sale of the goods, even if the seller acts as an intermediary of that second contract with the third-party supplier, and could fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2019/770 if the conditions of that Directive are met.
For instance, if the consumer downloads a game application from an app store onto a smart phone, the contract for the supply of the game application is separate from the contract for the sale of the smart phone itself.
This Directive should therefore only apply to the sales_contract concerning the smart phone, while the supply of the game application should fall under Directive (EU) 2019/770, if the conditions of that Directive are met.
Another example would be where it is expressly agreed that the consumer buys a smart phone without a specific operating system and the consumer subsequently concludes a contract for the supply of an operating system from a third party.
In such a case, the supply of the separately bought operating system would not form part of the sales_contract and therefore would not fall within the scope of this Directive but could fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2019/770, if the conditions of that Directive are met.
- = -
(31) In principle, in the case of goods with digital elements whereby the digital_content or digital_service incorporated in or inter-connected with the goods is supplied through a single act of supply, the seller should only be liable for a lack of conformity that exists at the time of delivery.
However, the obligation to provide updates should reflect the fact that the digital environment of any such good constantly changes.
Therefore, updates are a necessary tool in order to ensure that the goods are able to function in the same way that they did at the time of delivery.
Furthermore, in contrast to traditional goods, goods with digital elements are not completely separate from the seller's sphere because the seller, or a third person supplying the digital_content or digital_service under the sales_contract, is able to update the goods from a distance, usually over the internet.
Therefore, if the digital_content or digital_service is supplied by a single act of supply, the seller should be liable to provide the updates necessary to keep the goods with digital elements in conformity for a period of time that the consumer can reasonably expect, even if the goods were in conformity at the time of delivery.
The period of time during which the consumer can reasonably expect to receive updates should be assessed based on the type and purpose of the goods and the digital elements, and taking into account the circumstances and nature of the sales_contract.
A consumer would normally expect to receive updates for at least as long as the period during which the seller is liable for a lack of conformity, while in some cases the consumer's reasonable expectation could extend beyond that period, as might be the case particularly with regard to security updates.
In other cases, for instance as regards goods with digital elements the purpose of which is limited in time, the seller's obligation to provide updates would normally be limited to that time.
- = -
(33) Under this Directive, the seller should be obliged to deliver to the consumer goods which are in conformity at the time of delivery.
It is possible that sellers would make use of spare parts in order to fulfil their obligation to repair goods in the event of a lack of conformity that existed at the time of delivery.
while this Directive should not impose an obligation on sellers to ensure the availability of spare parts throughout a period of time as an objective requirement for conformity, it should not affect other provisions of national law obliging the seller, the producer or other person constituting a link in the chain of transactions, to ensure that spare parts are available or to inform consumers about such availability.
- = -
(42) For reasons of coherence with the existing national legal systems, Member States should be free to provide either that sellers are liable for a lack of conformity that becomes apparent within a specific period of time, possibly coupled with a limitation period, or that consumers' remedies are only subject to a limitation period.
In the former case, Member States should ensure that the period for the seller's liability is not circumvented by the limitation period for the consumer's remedies.
while this Directive should, therefore, not harmonise the starting point of national limitation periods, it should ensure that such limitation periods do not curtail the consumers' right to exercise their remedies for any lack of conformity which becomes apparent in the period during which the seller is liable for a lack of conformity.
In the latter case, Member States should be able to maintain or introduce only a limitation period for the consumer's remedies, without introducing a specific period within which the lack of conformity has to become apparent in order for the seller to be liable.
In order to ensure that consumers are equally protected also in such cases, Member States should ensure that where only a limitation period applies, it should still allow consumers to exercise the remedies for any lack of conformity that becomes apparent at least during the period of time provided for in this Directive as a liability period.
- = -
(62) In order to ensure that there is transparency, certain requirements as regards commercial_guarantees should be provided, alongside the pre-contractual information requirements on the existence and conditions of commercial_guarantees set out in Directive 2011/83/EU.
Moreover, in order to improve legal certainty and to avoid consumers being misled, this Directive should provide that, where commercial_guarantee conditions contained in associated advertisements are more favourable to the consumer than those included in the guarantee statement, the more advantageous conditions should prevail.
Finally, this Directive should provide rules on the content of the guarantee statement and on the way it should be made available to consumers.
For instance, the guarantee statement should include the terms of the commercial_guarantee and state that the legal guarantee of conformity is unaffected by the commercial_guarantee, making it clear that the commercial_guarantee terms constitute an undertaking that is additional to the legal guarantee of conformity.
Member States should be free to lay down rules on other aspects of commercial_guarantees not covered by this Directive, for example on associating debtors other than the guarantor with the commercial_guarantee, provided that those rules do not deprive consumers of the protection afforded to them by the fully harmonised provisions of this Directive on commercial_guarantees.
while Member States should remain free to require that commercial_guarantees be provided free_of_charge, they should ensure that any undertaking by the seller or the producer which falls under the definition of commercial_guarantees as set out in this Directive complies with the harmonised rules of this Directive.
- = -