(15) This Directive should apply to contracts for the sale of goods, including goods with digital elements where the absence of the incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_service would prevent the goods from performing their functions and where that digital_content or service is provided with the goods under the sales_contract concerning those goods.
Whether the supply of the incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_service forms part of the sales_contract with the seller should depend on the content of this contract.
This should include incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_services the supply of which is explicitly required by the contract.
It should also include sales_contracts which can be understood as covering the supply of specific digital_content or a specific digital_service because they are normal for goods of the same type and the consumer could reasonably expect them given the nature of the goods and taking into account any public statement made by or on behalf of the seller or other persons in previous links of the chain of transactions, including the producer.
If, for example, a smart TV were advertised as including a particular video application, that video application would be considered to be part of the sales_contract.
This should apply regardless of whether the digital_content or digital_service is pre-installed in the good itself or has to be downloaded subsequently on another device and is only inter-connected to the good.
For example, a smart phone could come with a standardised pre-installed application provided under the sales_contract, such as an alarm application or a camera application.
Another possible example is that of a smart watch.
In such a case, the watch itself would be considered to be the good with digital elements, which can perform its functions only with an application that is provided under the sales_contract but has to be downloaded by the consumer onto a smart phone; the application would then be the inter-connected digital element.
This should also apply if the incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_service is not supplied by the seller itself but is supplied, under the sales_contract, by a third party.
In order to avoid uncertainty for both sellers and consumers, in the event of doubt as to whether the supply of the digital_content or the digital_service forms part of the sales_contract, the rules of this Directive should apply.
Furthermore, ascertaining a bilateral contractual relationship, between the seller and the consumer, of which the supply of the incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_service forms part should not be affected by the mere fact that the consumer has to consent to a licensing agreement with a third party in order to benefit from the digital_content or the digital_service.
- = -
(16) In contrast, if the absence of the incorporated or inter-connected digital_content or digital_service does not prevent the goods from performing their functions, or if the consumer concludes a contract for the supply of digital_content or a digital_service which does not form part of the contract concerning the sale of goods with digital elements, that contract should be considered to be separate from the contract for the sale of the goods, even if the seller acts as an intermediary of that second contract with the third-party supplier, and could fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2019/770 if the conditions of that Directive are met.
For instance, if the consumer downloads a game application from an app store onto a smart phone, the contract for the supply of the game application is separate from the contract for the sale of the smart phone itself.
This Directive should therefore only apply to the sales_contract concerning the smart phone, while the supply of the game application should fall under Directive (EU) 2019/770, if the conditions of that Directive are met.
Another example would be where it is expressly agreed that the consumer buys a smart phone without a specific operating system and the consumer subsequently concludes a contract for the supply of an operating system from a third party.
In such a case, the supply of the separately bought operating system would not form part of the sales_contract and therefore would not fall within the scope of this Directive but could fall within the scope of Directive (EU) 2019/770, if the conditions of that Directive are met.
- = -
(18) This Directive should not affect national law to the extent that the matters concerned are not regulated by this Directive, in particular with regard to the legality of the goods, damages and general contract law aspects such as the formation, validity, nullity or effects of contracts.
The same should apply in relation to the consequences of the termination of the contract and to certain aspects regarding repair and replacement that are not regulated in this Directive.
When regulating the rights of parties to withhold the performance of their obligations or part thereof until the other party performs its obligations, Member States should remain free to regulate the conditions and modalities regarding the withholding of payment of the price by the consumer.
Member States should also remain free to regulate the consumer's entitlement to compensation for damage suffered as a consequence of an infringement by the seller of this Directive.
This Directive should also not affect national rules that do not specifically concern consumer contracts and provide for specific remedies for certain types of defects that were not apparent at the time of conclusion of the sales_contract, namely national provisions which may lay down specific rules for the seller's liability for hidden defects.
This Directive should also not affect national laws providing for non-contractual remedies for the consumer, in the event of lack of conformity of goods, against persons in previous links of the chain of transactions, for example manufacturers, or other persons that fulfil the obligations of such persons.
- = -
(30) In addition to contractually agreed updates, the seller should also provide updates, including security updates, in order to ensure that goods with digital elements remain in conformity.
The seller's obligation should be limited to updates which are necessary for such goods to maintain their conformity with the objective and subjective requirements for conformity laid down in this Directive.
Unless the parties have contractually agreed otherwise, the seller should not be obliged to provide upgraded versions of the digital_content or digital_service of the goods or to improve or extend the functionalities of goods beyond the conformity requirements.
If an update provided by the seller, or by a third party supplying the digital_content or digital_service under the sales_contract, causes a lack of conformity of the good with digital elements, the seller should be liable for bringing the good into conformity again.
The consumer should remain free to choose whether to install the updates provided.
Where the consumer decides not to install the updates which are necessary for the goods with digital elements to maintain their conformity, the consumer should however not expect such goods to remain in conformity.
The seller should inform the consumer that the consumer's decision not to install updates which are necessary for keeping the goods with digital elements in conformity, including security updates, will affect the seller's liability for conformity of those features of the goods with digital elements which the relevant updates are supposed to maintain in conformity.
This Directive should not affect obligations to provide security updates laid down in other Union law or in national law.
- = -
(34) A large number of goods have to be installed before they can be used effectively by the consumer.
In addition, in the case of goods with digital elements, the installation of the digital_content or digital_service is usually necessary for the consumer to be able to use such goods in line with their intended purpose.
Therefore, any lack of conformity resulting from an incorrect installation of the goods, including from the incorrect installation of the digital_content or digital_service incorporated in or inter-connected with the goods, should be regarded as a lack of conformity, where the installation was performed by the seller or under the seller's control.
Where the goods were intended to be installed by the consumer, a lack of conformity resulting from incorrect installation should be regarded as a lack of conformity of the goods, irrespective of whether the installation was performed by the consumer or by a third party under the consumer's responsibility, if the incorrect installation was due to shortcomings in the installation instructions, such as incompleteness or a lack of clarity making the installation instructions difficult to use for the average consumer.
- = -
(35) Conformity should cover material defects as well as legal defects.
Restrictions resulting from a violation of third-party rights, in particular intellectual property rights, could prevent or limit the use of the goods in accordance with the contract.
Member States should ensure that in such cases the consumer is entitled to remedies for the lack of conformity as set out in this Directive, unless national law provides for the nullity of the contract or for its rescission in such cases.
- = -
(54) Member States should be able to regulate the conditions under which the performance of the debtor can be fulfilled by another person, for example the conditions under which the seller's obligation to repair a good can be performed by the consumer or a third party at the seller's expense.
- = -
(63) Considering that the seller is liable towards the consumer for any lack of conformity of the goods resulting from an act or omission of the seller or a third party, the seller should be able to pursue remedies against the person responsible in previous links of the chain of transactions.
Such remedies should include those for a lack of conformity which results from the omission of an update, including a security update, which would have been necessary to keep the good with digital elements in conformity.
However, this Directive should not affect the principle of freedom of contract between the seller and other parties in the chain of transactions.
The details for exercising that right, in particular against whom and how such remedies are to be pursued and whether the remedies are of a mandatory nature, should be provided by the Member States.
The question as to whether the consumer can also raise a claim directly against a person in previous links of the chain of transactions should not be regulated by this Directive, except in cases where a producer offers the consumer a commercial_guarantee for the goods.
- = -