(25) In order to provide clarity as to what a consumer can expect from the goods and what the seller would be liable for in the event of failure to deliver what is expected, it is essential to fully harmonise rules for determining whether goods are in conformity.
Any reference to conformity in this Directive should refer to conformity of the goods with the sales_contract.
In order to safeguard the legitimate interests of both parties to a sales_contract, conformity should be assessed based on both subjective and objective requirements for conformity.
- = -
(28) Given that the digital_content or digital_services incorporated in or inter-connected with goods are constantly developing, sellers may agree with consumers to provide updates for such goods.
Updates, as agreed in the sales_contract, can improve and enhance the digital_content or digital_service element of goods, extend their functionalities, adapt them to technical developments, protect them against new security threats or serve other purposes.
The conformity of goods with digital_content or digital_services which are incorporated in or inter-connected with the goods should, therefore, also be assessed in relation to whether the digital_content or digital_service element of such goods is updated in accordance with the sales_contract.
Failure to supply updates that had been agreed in the sales_contract should be considered as a lack of conformity of the goods.
Moreover, defective or incomplete updates should also be considered as a lack of conformity of the goods, given that that would mean that such updates are not performed in the manner stipulated in the sales_contract.
- = -
(29) In order to be in conformity, the goods should not only comply with the subjective requirements for conformity but should in addition comply with the objective requirements for conformity set out in this Directive.
Conformity should be assessed, inter alia, by considering the purpose for which goods of the same type would normally be used, whether they are supplied with the accessories and instructions that the consumer can reasonably expect to receive or whether they correspond to the sample or model that the seller made available to the consumer.
The goods should also possess the qualities and features which are normal for goods of the same type and which the consumer can reasonably expect, given the nature of the goods and taking into account any public statement made by or on behalf of the seller or other persons in previous links of the chain of transactions.
- = -
(31) In principle, in the case of goods with digital elements whereby the digital_content or digital_service incorporated in or inter-connected with the goods is supplied through a single act of supply, the seller should only be liable for a lack of conformity that exists at the time of delivery.
However, the obligation to provide updates should reflect the fact that the digital environment of any such good constantly changes.
Therefore, updates are a necessary tool in order to ensure that the goods are able to function in the same way that they did at the time of delivery.
Furthermore, in contrast to traditional goods, goods with digital elements are not completely separate from the seller's sphere because the seller, or a third person supplying the digital_content or digital_service under the sales_contract, is able to update the goods from a distance, usually over the internet.
Therefore, if the digital_content or digital_service is supplied by a single act of supply, the seller should be liable to provide the updates necessary to keep the goods with digital elements in conformity for a period of time that the consumer can reasonably expect, even if the goods were in conformity at the time of delivery.
The period of time during which the consumer can reasonably expect to receive updates should be assessed based on the type and purpose of the goods and the digital elements, and taking into account the circumstances and nature of the sales_contract.
A consumer would normally expect to receive updates for at least as long as the period during which the seller is liable for a lack of conformity, while in some cases the consumer's reasonable expectation could extend beyond that period, as might be the case particularly with regard to security updates.
In other cases, for instance as regards goods with digital elements the purpose of which is limited in time, the seller's obligation to provide updates would normally be limited to that time.
- = -
(32) Ensuring longer durability of goods is important for achieving more sustainable consumption patterns and a circular economy.
Similarly, keeping non-compliant products out of the Union market by strengthening market surveillance and providing the right incentives to economic operators is essential in order to increase trust in the functioning of the internal market.
For those purposes, product-specific Union legislation is the most appropriate means of introducing durability and other product-related requirements in relation to specific types or groups of products, using for this purpose adapted criteria.
This Directive should therefore be complementary to the objectives pursued in such Union product-specific legislation, and should include durability as an objective criterion for the assessment of conformity of goods.
Durability in this Directive should refer to the ability of the goods to maintain their required functions and performance through normal use.
In order for goods to be in conformity, they should possess the durability which is normal for goods of the same type and which the consumer can reasonably expect given the nature of the specific goods, including the possible need for reasonable maintenance of the goods, such as the regular inspection or changing of filters in a car, and any public statement made by or on behalf of any person constituting a link in the chain of transactions.
The assessment should also take into account all other relevant circumstances, such as the price of the goods and the intensity or frequency of the use that the consumer makes of the goods.
In addition, insofar as specific durability information is indicated in any pre-contractual statement which forms part of the sales_contract, the consumer should be able to rely on them as a part of the subjective requirements for conformity.
- = -
(37) Enhancing legal certainty for both consumers and sellers requires a clear indication of the time when the conformity of the goods should be assessed.
The relevant time for assessing the conformity of the goods should be the time when the goods are delivered.
This should also apply to goods which incorporate or are inter-connected with digital_content or a digital_service supplied through a single act of supply.
However, where the digital_content or digital_service incorporated in or inter-connected with the goods is to be supplied continuously over a period of time, the relevant time for the purpose of establishing conformity of that digital_content or digital_service element should not be one specific moment in time but rather a period of time, starting from the time of delivery.
For reasons of legal certainty, that period of time should be equal to the period during which the seller is liable for a lack of conformity.
- = -
(71) It is appropriate for the Commission to review the application of this Directive five years after its entry into force, including in particular the provisions regarding remedies, the burden of proof – also with respect to second-hand goods as well as goods sold at public_auctions – and the producer's commercial_guarantee of durability.
The Commission should also assess whether the application of this Directive and of Directive (EU) 2019/770 ensures a consistent and coherent legal framework with regard to the supply of digital_content or digital_services and goods with digital elements.
- = -